Northr - Client Journey & Loop Board

Internal operating board. Single authoritative view of where every client is. Human-confirmed facts sit ABOVE the agents (confirmed-facts), so a thing you explain once is not re-raised. Every item is a record or an alert; a person acts (owner tagged). Refreshes twice daily; this is the morning pass of 21 August, derived from a spine written at 06:40 today. Read the day in one line: yesterday was the first day in this venture’s history that was pure delivery, and delivery went well. An eleven-day standing blocker died when the first client address went live on our own namespace; the wrong-number defect that had sat on a hotel page for six days closed, measured on the wire rather than claimed; a rebrand shipped byte-for-byte on the same morning it was asked for. Against that, four things went the other way and all four are cheap today and expensive next week: a rebranded client’s address was chosen and then never registered, a commission cut sits corrected on disk and undeployed on the wire, a client asked for her page to be taken offline and it is still up, and the money book and the owner disagree about whether a paid instalment exists. The two standing numbers barely moved: ~107 pages built and in front of nobody, down one on the window’s single send, and €3,105 to €3,305 outside a clean company account, unchanged.

READ FIRST - #1 BLOCKER, UNCHANGED IN SUBSTANCE AND NOW FOUR DAYS INTO A STATUTORY OVERDUE: EVERY CLIENT PAYMENT LINK THIS VENTURE HAS EVER MINTED SITS IN AN ENTITY IVO HAS RULED OUT, AND THAT ENTITY IS LATE ON A FILING. The money half is his own ruling: the shared entity behind that account has other partners who would have a claim on anything routed through it. Exposure is €350 confirmed, a further €200 unresolved between two destinations, and beneath them live recurring charges on older accounts that have been running for months and have never been counted. The legal half is a clock: that entity’s annual confirmation statement went overdue on 17 Aug and is now four days late, and its accounts fall due on 31 Aug, ten days out. An overdue confirmation statement leads to strike-off action, and this is the same entity ruled the public-facing name on the business listings. ⚠ And the replacement route is not available either: the new company’s registration was REJECTED, so there is no clean destination to move any of this to. Four actions, all his: mint nothing further there; get a live read of that account to size the exposure; file the statement and the accounts; then decide what, if anything, is owed to the other partners. ⚠ Two finished pages below remain marked DO-NOT-SEND for an unpatched defect, and a client’s explicit take-down request is eleven hours old and unactioned.

Won / care rows (nothing left, 14th window)

Agreed monthlies never once billed

€3.1-3.3k

Outside a clean account, countable per leg

~107

Built, unsent - 0 in, 1 out

Open items, 9 blockers (fresh spine)

Loop health - did the agents run

Nightly reconcile

Green, on cadence, and this board is built on what it wrote rather than on yesterday’s copy. It fired at 2026-08-21 ~06:38 BG and next runs 2026-08-22 ~06:37 BG. Its live column is the strongest read this board has ever carried: 158 addresses re-checked in a clean scratch directory with caching and compression defeated, 149 answered, and none of the nine non-answers is a defect - two are known wrong-host lookups whose correct addresses both answer, three are builds correctly stopped before any code existed, two are the new address redirecting exactly as designed, and two are a terminal declined row and an address that was never registered. Genuine dead objects: zero, third consecutive run. ✅ It also compacted itself and said so: ten days of superseded headers and closed items were cut, a backup was retained, and not one client row was touched.

Reply capture

Still switched off. Last ran 2026-06-29 ~21:22 BG, 53 days ago, and it has no next run because it is disabled rather than late. Known off-switch, not a fault - the nightly reconcile writes the signal log itself and did so again this morning, folding 26 messages across 11 channels by hand. ⚠ The consequence is today: the demos sent on 16 August hit day 5 today, which is the nudge date, and nothing automatic is holding it. The family hotel’s promised call-back outcome from 17 August has still never been posted anywhere. That nudge will be found late unless a person diaries it this morning.

Care-delivery audit

Green, on cadence, and the quietest of the three because it only runs weekly. It ran Mon 2026-08-17 ~07:58 BG and next runs Mon 2026-08-24 ~06:48 BG, so its finding is four days old and will not be re-tested for three more. That finding ages by a day each pass: the four-client August care gap is on day 21, on money already taken, which is two thirds of the month gone. ⚠ Its remit is still too narrow - three further clients have an agreed monthly that has never once been billed, a shape this audit does not look for at all.

confirmed-facts = human ground truth above the agents; unchanged since 16 Aug, and the three-piles ruling it carries still governs how the unsent count is read. Authority order: confirmed facts, then money, then the acts log, then what was said in client channels, then the agents’ summary. This morning every layer is fresh and they agree on all but one point: the spine was written at 06:40 today, the money book carries a per-payment layer, and the client channels were read to the end of results - but the money book and the owner’s own words now contradict each other on a single €100 instalment, which is the first item below. Where earlier rulings retired a claim, the claim stays retired: the psychologist’s build is PAID, the hotel-and-gym client’s care question is CLOSED, and the September launch date belongs to the client, not to a bottleneck.

Needs action - open items (owner tagged)

PROCESS, AND IT IS GOOD NEWS TWICE OVER. First, this board is built on a spine written this morning, so every day-counter below is measured, not advanced by arithmetic. Second, the spine declared its own housekeeping instead of doing it quietly: it had grown from 147 KB to 477 KB in ten days purely by accreting superseded headers, so everything dated 17 Aug and earlier was cut, the previous file was retained as a backup, and no client row was altered. A record that prunes itself in the open is worth more than one that grows until nobody reads it. Ivo

#1 BLOCKER - THE RULED-OUT ENTITY HOLDS EVERY PAYMENT LINK WE HAVE EVER MINTED, IT IS FOUR DAYS OVERDUE ON A STATUTORY FILING, AND THE REPLACEMENT COMPANY WAS REJECTED. The money half is Ivo’s own ruling: the shared entity behind that account has other partners with a claim on anything routed through it, exposure €350 confirmed plus €200 unresolved between two destinations, and live recurring charges on older accounts nobody has counted. The legal half is a clock: the confirmation statement went overdue 17 Aug and the accounts fall due 31 Aug, on the entity just ruled the public-facing name on the business listings. Overdue statements lead to strike-off. And there is no clean destination waiting: the new company’s registration was refused, so „move it to the new entity“ is not currently an option. Mint nothing further there; get a live read to size it; file both; then decide what is owed to the other partners. Ivo

#2 BLOCKER - THE MONEY BOOK AND THE OWNER DISAGREE ON WHETHER A PAID INSTALMENT EXISTS. NEW TODAY. Ivo wrote in the coffee client’s channel yesterday at 15:21 that the terms are unchanged, „300 for the build in three instalments of 100, the first one in August, not yet charged“. The structured money book records that same €100 as RECEIVED on 15 Aug, in cash, collected by the rep, sourced to her own words in that same channel. One of the two is wrong. Nothing false was said to the client, so this costs nothing today - but it means either the book overstates collections by €100, or the owner does not know a rep is holding a paid instalment. Both are load-bearing. Book it or strike it. Ivo / Elena

#3 BLOCKER - THE PARTNER COMMISSION CUT FROM 30% TO 20% IS CORRECT ON DISK AND STILL WRONG ON THE WIRE, ~27 HOURS. AND YESTERDAY’S RECORD THAT CALLED IT CLOSED IS HEREBY CORRECTED. The local file reads 20% four times, 30% zero times. The live partner page, measured on the wire this morning, reads 30% four times. Yesterday’s pass marked the gate closed on the strength of a local diff only; that was wrong. The gate condition is not met, so the partner’s €120 on the German guest-house chain stays blocked while the page still promises her the old rate. A commission rate is money, so no agent ships it: this is a one-tap yes from Ivo, not a stall. Ivo

#4 BLOCKER - A RETIRED ADDRESS IS STILL SERVING THE WRONG BUSINESS, DAY 7. Measured this morning: the old Свети Влас address answers 200 at 1,316,093 bytes with the wrong brand 29 times and the right one zero times, byte-for-byte the same page it has served since 14 Aug, while the correct page sits beside it at 200 / 1,513,920 bytes. ✅ The correct link was finally handed to the rep on 20 Aug at 10:59 with Ivo’s own apology for three days unposted - so she now holds both, and one of them is a wrong-business page. That is one forward away from a live error. Retire or redirect the old address. Ivo

#5 BLOCKER - THE MUSIC-STUDIO CLIENT IS ON DAY 16 ON €600 ALREADY PAID: THE ADDRESS WAS CHOSEN AND NEVER REGISTERED. The rebrand shipped cleanly yesterday at 11:03 - all three of the client’s own copy asks, verified byte-for-byte at 155,803 bytes, share card re-cut, bilingual parity 101/101, brand locked against browser auto-translate. The rep named the address at 18:27. Ivo’s own message that morning said to register it immediately and without waiting for him, so this fires unattended under the small-spend pre-authorisation. Twelve hours later the name does not resolve at all and the paid client is still on a temporary address. ⚠ Read the failure precisely: this is NOT gated on Ivo, which is exactly why nobody is holding it. The name is unregistered and takeable, and registration is the cheap irreversible step even though go-live itself travels with the September care start. unowned - assign it

#6 BLOCKER - A CLIENT ASKED US TO TAKE HER LIVE PAGE DOWN AND IT IS STILL UP, ELEVEN HOURS. The rep, 20 Aug 19:28: the client has no registered company yet, which worries her a great deal, so „let us make the demo offline and keep it for a later stage“. That is a soft no plus an explicit un-publish request, and the page still answers 200 at 42,613 bytes. The row moves to Parked either way; what needs a person is the un-publish itself - take it down, or leave it and let it lapse - because it is a client’s explicit ask and doing neither is the one option that is not defensible. Elena (asked) / execution unowned

#7 BLOCKER - TWO FINISHED, LIVE PAGES CARRY A DEFECT THIS BOOK HAS ALREADY RULED ON TWICE, AND BOTH ARE STILL UNPATCHED. The night-bazaar page animates the rating 4.2 and the review count 23,669; the museum page animates rating and reviews the same way. Both carry no translate guard on any wordmark. An animated number that is a factual claim can latch a false value - that is exactly how a page shipped a wrong rating - and browser auto-translate both freezes animated counters and rewrites brand strings. Static markup plus a guard on every wordmark, then they are sendable. Until then they are live and must not go anywhere. Ivo

#8 BLOCKER - €3,105 TO €3,305 SITS OUTSIDE A CLEAN COMPANY ACCOUNT, ACROSS FIVE HOLDERS PLUS TWO UNKNOWNS. Unchanged in size this window and countable leg by leg rather than estimated: a rep’s cash, two personal accounts belonging to Ivo, a partner’s personal account, a balance on the ruled-out entity, a door-opener holding cash recorded nowhere, and one instalment whose destination was never stated. The monthly handover this was supposed to run through has never once happened, and the company account it was supposed to land in does not exist because the registration was refused. Every new close makes this bigger. Ivo

#9 BLOCKER - THE ONLY PERSON WHO CAN PRICE AND SEND IS LOCKED OUT OF 21 CLIENT CHANNELS, NINE OF WHICH HOLD A FINISHED, LIVE DEMO. Carried from yesterday and honestly stated as carried: no channel was created in this window, so the gap cannot have grown, and it was not re-measured this morning. The root cause is a missing capability, not a person forgetting - there is no way to add a member to an existing channel through the interface we drive; the invite works only at creation, and it was skipped on twelve of twenty-two creations in a single batch. Ivo escalated it in writing on 19 Aug. The 21 are manual one-clicks today; the recurrence needs a tool. Ivo

A NEW REP WAS PROMISED A RATE THE BOOK HAS ALREADY RULED AGAINST. The rep asked yesterday at 18:28 for a referral code for a new name at 30%. The 22 June confirmed-fact fixes the new-rep standard at 10% build / 40% care; 30% build is grandfathered to four named earlier reps only. No code has been issued and no sale exists, so this costs a sentence today and a renegotiation after a close. Ivo

CARE REVENUE HAS NEVER STARTED ON THREE CLIENTS WHO HAVE PAID FOR A BUILD. The psychologist: build €300 PAID, live on her own address 24 days, monthly €29 never once billed, and delivery is materially ahead of billing - a full September campaign and a ten-asset pack shipped into an unbilled plan. The German guest house: €49 recorded against €40 verbally offered, nothing mintable until the rep says which closed, and the client has asked for a payment link that cannot be produced (day 36). The coffee client: monthly figure still never restated, care starts September. The excavator client: total build price and monthly fee recorded nowhere on a row that has taken a €100 deposit. ✅ The gym-and-hotel client’s September start is the client’s own decision, not a leak - do not re-flag it. Ivo / Elena

NOT ONE REP-COLLECTED PAYMENT HAS AN INDEPENDENT CLIENT CONFIRMATION, AND THE CONFIRMATION LOG HAS NEVER BEEN USED. The file is 221 bytes and empty. Affected: €100 on 15 Aug, €100 on 16 Aug, €150 on 07 Aug, €120 on 22 Jul, €35 standing. No remittance of the company’s 60% has ever been reconciled, and the commission ledger last moved 18 Aug and does not carry three of those rows. This is the control that makes the cash rail auditable; without it, netting hides a leg, which is the exact thing the 22 June rule forbids. Ivo / Elena

UNRULED OR UNBOOKED COMMISSION LEGS, ALL OF THEM IVO’S. The hotel-services care €200 - the ledger excludes the rep as an Ivo-collected account, yet she closed and chased it: 40% or excluded? Unruled since 04 Aug. The annual care €150 - she closed and collected, unbooked. The coffee €100 - unbooked. The music studio’s €180 and the guest house’s €180 chains are ruled but unpaid. ⚠ And the guest house has three claimants on one deal, two of them with unproven attribution: if all three stacked, €390 of €600 leaves and the house keeps €12.25 a month on the stream doctrine calls the actual business. That is precisely why the pool is fixed and divided along the chain, never stacked. Ivo

A PILE OF SMALL ASKS THAT BELONG TO THE REP, RECORDED SO THEY ARE NOT LOST AND DELIBERATELY NOT ESCALATED. Whose number is the disputed reservations line (the hotel page ships with no call button until she answers); the Velingrad price is internally contradictory in her own wording - „one-off 100 per month for the build“ - and needs one word before it is quoted; the Карнобат venue that went silent, let it lie or one last direct approach to a named owner; lev-versus-euro on the €300 build and again on the €150 annual care; whether the second orders contact’s card needs a job title and email; whether the consulting client’s second offer needs sharpening now that „free“ no longer differentiates it. Elena

ENTITY-LEVEL, AND NOT A WEBSITE PROBLEM. Beyond the overdue filing at the top of this board, our own public software-directory listing is owner-verified, is ours, and describes a product Northr does not sell - „a focus system for teams and individuals“, priced at $5/month, a figure that appears in no pricing ruling anywhere. It is a live public page with a wrong product and a wrong price on it. Ivo

🌐 CLOSED THIS WINDOW, AND IT IS THE BIGGEST ONE: THE FIRST CLIENT ADDRESS EVER SERVED OFF OUR OWN NAMESPACE IS LIVE, WHICH ENDS AN ELEVEN-DAY STANDING BLOCKER. Registered at 15:18 for USD 10.46 with auto-renew to 2027, live at 18:19, and verified rather than assumed: the main address answers 200 at 356,122 bytes with the client’s own title and brand 57 times, zero foreign-tenant content, and both the www form and the old temporary address redirect to it as designed. ⚠⚠ The durable lesson is the near-miss: the automation briefly pointed that address at a Taiwanese biomedical-regulation firm, and it was caught only because Ivo opened the address and read what it served instead of trusting the script’s „ok“. Nothing was ever public. Remaining and manual: search-engine submission and linking the business profile. Ivo

✅ CLOSED THIS WINDOW: THE SIX-DAY WRONG-NUMBER DEFECT ON THE HOTEL PAGE, AND IT CLOSED BY BYTES RATHER THAN BY CLAIM. The rebuilt page answers 200 at 1,350,171 bytes and on the served body the disputed number appears zero times and there is no call link at all. It ships with no phone by decision, because the inversion is that the hotel’s own social page publishes that same disputed number - so the likeliest explanation is one shared restaurant line, not a wrong number. Rating, hours and room count are deliberately omitted because they belong to the joint record. Rooms lead, the restaurant is a section, and the commission argument that was absent from the previous page entirely is now the spine of it. The do-not-send is lifted. One question sits with the rep and only her: whose number it is. Elena

PROCESS - ZERO BUILDS, ONE SEND, AND THAT IS THE RIGHT SHAPE FOR ONCE. The first zero-build window since 18 Aug, spent entirely on delivery: two addresses went live, a rebrand shipped, a hotel page was rebuilt, a corrected product label and a second orders phone went out on a live client site. The single send was a re-send to a couple the rep had spoken to by phone, at an intended €50 plus €15 a month, and a second venue got a call and a number left with staff. Both are sub-€1k and therefore her price, her send, no Ivo gate. The client-channel roster is FLAT at 123, the first flat window since 18 Aug. Elena

Revenue base - won / care

Client	Stage	Build	Care	Owner	Next
Nina Atelie (rebranded „Струни - ателие“, music studio)	🔴 PAID, DAY 16 OFF ITS OWN ADDRESS	600 PAID (05 Aug, direct to Ivo)	24/mo from SEPT	Ivo / Elena	✅ The build side went perfectly yesterday: the rebrand and all three of the client’s own copy asks shipped at 11:03, verified byte-for-byte at 155,803 bytes, share card re-cut, parity 101/101, no em-dashes, brand locked against auto-translate. The old shortlist was correctly voided because it was built on the old name. 🔴 And then the one remaining step did not happen: the rep named the address at 18:27 and twelve hours later it does not resolve. Registration needs no approval under the small-spend pre-authorisation, which is why it is nobody’s. The commission chain is ruled and booked (three names, fixed pool, €420 to the house) but unpaid. Photo block unchanged and correct: recognisable children’s faces, no parental consent
Къща за гости Jost (guest house, Sankt Goar, Germany)	💵 BUILD PAID 16 Aug	600 PAID (into a partner’s personal account)	49 ruled / 40 said	Elena	Page re-verified live this morning. ⚠ The number facing the client is still contradictory: 49 published on the partner page, 40 said on the call. Nothing is minted until the rep says which closed. ⚠ The client has asked for a payment link and cannot be given one - day 36, the first time the outage blocks a client actively trying to pay. Go-live is gated on her accountant naming the legal form, which is hers and not ours. ⚠ Hard deadline: the town sells out for a river festival in the second week of September, now about three weeks out - last year they had rooms and no way to offer them. Care not started. Commission ruled, three claimants, two unproven
Услуги с Bobcat и мини багер (Несебър и региона)	💵 DEPOSIT PAID, work due September	100 deposit, total UNKNOWN	no figure anywhere	Elena	The deposit is double-sourced and this row has taken money - the rep in-channel on 16 Aug corroborated what Ivo had said directly, so the 16 August caveat is discharged. The €100 went straight to Ivo, so it is not part of the rep-held cash pile. 🔴 The commercials behind it exist in no record at all: no total build price, no monthly fee, on a row that has already taken a deposit. The page still ships placeholder chips and no call link
Психопозитив (Мирела)	✅ BUILD PAID - care never started, day 24 live	300 PAID (18 Aug, personal account, no invoice)	29 NEVER BILLED	Ivo	24 days live, a full September campaign and a ten-asset pack delivered, and the monthly has never once been charged. Delivery is materially ahead of billing on Ivo’s own client - recorded as a leak, not as a bottleneck on anyone else. ✅ The „€0 collected“ framing this board once carried is RETIRED and must not return: the build IS paid. Open gates: her invoice details and the full cabinet address, which block the map, the schema and the contacts block. ⚠ A live defect was found and fixed here - the old contact form composed nothing and was silently discarding every enquiry for an unknown period; she should be told, it changes how she reads her past lead flow
Coffee Shop (brand now „Lady Queen“, Карнобат)	💵 WON - 🔴 instalment 1 disputed	300 in 3 x 100 ⚠ is #1 paid or not?	24/mo deferred to launch	Elena	🔴 THE RECORD AND THE OWNER DISAGREE ON WHETHER INSTALMENT 1 EXISTS - see the second open item above. Book it or strike it. ✅ Delivery yesterday was clean: the real address shipped the corrected cherry label (the known misprinted packet, replaced from her own drive drop and re-verified off the live site) and a second orders phone under the first. Local 1,359,721 bytes, the live copy differs only by the known 450-byte email-obfuscation rewrite, parity 209/209. Open at the rep: does the second contact’s card need a job title and email, and lev-versus-euro on the 300
Brilliantin (hotel + restaurant, Сливен)	Care, LIVE on its own address	350 PAID (into the ruled-out entity)	120 = 6mo x 20 PREPAID	Ivo	This row is the one confirmed euro figure inside the #1 blocker: the €350 build was paid into the shared entity Ivo has since ruled out, where other partners would have a claim on it. ✅ Live on its own real address, apex and www both answering with valid certificates; the temporary address redirects there and that redirect is client-side, so it can only be verified by rendering - never report it broken on a command-line result. Twelve real client photographs shipped. Remaining and small: the search-indexing go-live step, plus a €50 restaurant add-on awaiting the client’s confirmation. ⚠ Carried and not specific to this client: the registrant is an entity Ivo does not wholly own
Rakadiko	Care, PREPAID to Aug 2027	200 paid ⚠ destination unresolved	150 cash, 12 months	Elena	✅ NOTHING TO COLLECT FROM THIS CLIENT. The first annual prepay in the book, taken in cash on 07 Aug at a discount, which closed a care month that had been carried overdue for 34 consecutive runs. Use it as the live proof point for the identical annual push still open on his BROTHER. Do not chase and do not mint a monthly link. Two small residuals: the message never stated the currency, recorded as unconfirmed rather than assumed silently; and the rep’s commission on the 150 is unbooked although she both closed and collected it. The monthly social auto-publish remains open on a platform access gate
Kapitanovi (Kiten)	Care - 🔴 zero August delivery	200 paid	120/yr cash prepaid (~10/mo)	Elena	⚠ The worst of the four zero-delivery care accounts, because here it is a broken written promise rather than a silent gap. Day 21 and unchanged. They prepaid a full year in cash up front, held by the rep, and the June and July packs both closed with „the next pack comes at the beginning of August“ in copy forwarded to the client. It is the 21st and no August pack exists. This is the one the client can check for herself. Care money is settled, so the only money item is the rail remit of the held cash; the off-season rate stays open
Food Addiction	Care (green)	40/mo build sub ACTIVE	19/mo care sub ACTIVE	Elena	Live on its own real address. Standing open item: the card-versus-cash double-collect confirm is still the rep’s to close. ⚠ August care cycle not yet started - one of the four zero-delivery accounts, day 21. Also carries an unarmed redirect on its temporary address, which creates duplicate content against the paying client’s own domain
Kameli Club (hotel services)	✅ CARE PAID FOR THE YEAR - settled	400 PAID (one paid, one refunded)	200/yr PAID 03 Aug	Ivo	✅ Nothing is open with this client and she must NOT be approached for further care money this year - the agreed 228 was closed at 200 by ruling and the delta waived deliberately as relationship investment. Do not re-raise the gap; it is a decision, not a shortfall. One item remains and it is Ivo’s: the commission. The ledger excludes the rep as an Ivo-collected account, yet she closed and chased this care - 40% or excluded? Unruled since 04 Aug, and nothing is booked until he says. ⚠ August care delivery is zero, day 21
Champions Lab	Care starts SEPT - the client set the clock	200 PAID	19/mo from September	Ivo	✅ Do NOT read this row as blocked on Ivo - that framing is retired. The client ruled on 16 Aug that the launch is September, gated on her own new schedule and full location list, so the monthly starts then by her decision. Her disciplines correction was applied and verified by reading the live page back on both addresses, parity 185/185; three professional studio photographs received and verified by opening them; a schedule-free ten-asset social pack was produced. With Ivo: a shortlist of addresses for her to pick, then the care link at the September launch. Awaiting from her: the new schedule and all locations
Coffee Delmar (Дилмар)	Build closed at 150, care from SEPT	150 closed, how much in hand?	monthly figure never restated	Elena	Live on its own real address, re-verified this morning. The client set both numbers himself on 16 Aug: build 150 total and he will pay no more for it, monthly starts September. ⚠ Two things only the rep can close: how much of the 150 is actually in hand (the book records 100, and a further 50 is counted with her but never recorded as received) and what the monthly number actually is - the book still says 15 and it has never been restated. ✅ His BROTHER just prepaid a year in cash at a discount - use that as the annual push here
TMB Smart (consult)	Delivered / CLOSED	600 / 600 PAID IN FULL	n/a	Ivo	Nothing open on money. Housekeeping only: deactivate the redundant link minted on the ruled-out entity once that account can be reached, and do not send it. Still gated on the client’s list of ten. ⚠ The first instalment’s destination account was never stated, which is one of the two unknowns inside the rail figure
BusinessTax (Niki)	Won - free build, care not triggered	FREE (gift)	19 or 29, his choice	Ivo	Demo live. Mint the care on his choice once there is a clean account to mint it in. The access-handover window EXPIRED on 15 Jul when the incumbent developer relocated - establish from Niki whether the hosting and registrar access was ever taken and, if not, which route replaces it. Site live and unaffected
Terzieva Ivancheva (law firm)	Won - free build, care not triggered	FREE (gift)	19 or 29, her choice	Ivo	Displacement demo live; her domain is renewed to 2027, so the fuse that looked urgent in June is gone. Same revised access-handover ask as the sister company above. Mint on her choice
Boyzone (Bizon Electronics, scooters)	Care (gift) - ⚠ deliverable still unpublished	n/a (gift)	5 PAID on the owner’s own card	Elena	🔴 The last client sitting in the exact condition that churned the tyre-service account: paid, deliverable approved on 20 Jul, still unpublished - now about five weeks. The photographs can publish the standard way today - placeholder where needed, swap on the real ones. Video is the only part still blocked, on a hosting decision that the object storage now live probably already answers. ✅ The cancel-and-refund action is RETIRED - nothing is being collected at all, and the €5 a month accrues as a backlog to be charged when a clean account exists
Кондио (Яна Кондио)	Delivered, NO price and NOT sent	not on record	not on record	Ivo	⚠ A live-site defect, still unfixed: the page declares a typeface that ships no Cyrillic, so every Bulgarian sentence renders in whatever the visitor’s device substitutes - handwritten in one browser, different on every device. Not introduced by us, flagged in-channel, still open. ⚠ And the commercial frame does not exist: she now has a site, a print-ready card and twenty posts delivered with no price attached and nothing sent. Decide the frame, then send. Also carried: reconcile ownership, since the rep called her „my client“ while the commercial state is Ivo-brought

In-flight - deployed / sent

Client	Stage	Owner	Next
Маями (Свети Влас - hotel with restaurant)	✅ REV-2 LIVE - do-not-send LIFTED	Elena	✅ The six-day defect closed, measured on the served file rather than claimed: 200 at 1,350,171 bytes, the disputed number zero times, no call link at all. It ships with no phone by decision, because the hotel’s own social page publishes that same number - most likely one shared restaurant line rather than a wrong number. Rating, hours and room count are deliberately omitted because they belong to the joint record with the other property. Rooms lead, restaurant is a section, and the commission argument that was absent from the previous page entirely is now the spine of it. One question, hers alone: whose number it is
Милев (Свети Влас - correct brand)	🔴 LIVE, but the RETIRED address still serves the wrong business	Ivo	The correct page answers 200 at 1,513,920 bytes with the right brand 15 times, and the rep was handed that link on 20 Aug with an apology for three days unposted. 🔴 The retired address beside it still answers 200 with the WRONG brand 29 times, day 7 - retire or redirect it. ⚠ And the pitch is INVERTED on this row: they have a live site, so never open with „you have no website“
Kalina i Milan	✅ SENT 20 Aug - the window’s only send	Elena	Re-sent at 19:36 after the rep called and spoke to the owner’s wife, at an intended €50 build plus €15 a month. No longer a park candidate - back in the warm table. Sub-€1k, so her price and her send with no Ivo gate. Nudge at +2 and +5 from yesterday
Paradise (Велинград)	Contacted, NOT yet quoted	Elena	Second call made, staff reached, her number left. ⚠ The intended price is internally contradictory in her own wording - „one-off 100 per month for the build“ - and needs one word from her before it is quoted to anybody. Intended €100 build plus €15 care
Бохеми (Карнобат - one venue, two names)	Sent - no reply, 2nd attempt	Elena	The rep asked and was told „we showed the owners and they said nothing“. Logged as SILENCE, not refusal: no objection, no price said, no owner contact. Second no-answer attempt. Her call: let it lie, or one last direct approach to a named owner
Искрички на радост	🔴 SOFT NO + TAKE-DOWN ASKED - still live	Elena	🔴 She has no registered company, which worries her, and asked for the demo to go offline and be kept for later. Eleven hours on, the page still answers 200 at 42,613 bytes. Row moves to Parked, reversible on registration - but the un-publish itself is a client’s explicit ask and needs a person to either do it or decide not to
Лазерен център Hera Stil (Айтос)	🆕 LIVE 18 Aug, unsent, unpriced	Elena	Briefed off a field note at 01:07 and live at 12:01, verified at 911,017 bytes, live identical to local. WARM - she has the relationship, so the cold cap does not apply. ✅ The rep is a member of this channel. ⚠ Two facts that must survive into the pitch: their old domain is DEAD, so „you have no website“ is the wrong opening and „your website is gone“ is the right one
Козметичен салон Ирис / PARADISE (Карнобат)	🔴 LIVE 18 Aug - THE REP IS LOCKED OUT, day 3	Elena	Live and verified at 1,034,589 bytes; the „two links are one page“ trap was caught before building, so one demo was made rather than two. 🔴 The person who would price and send it still cannot see it - the channel has one member, the workspace app - on day 3. ⚠ The name call is genuinely open and hers: this is one business under four names
Милица Петрова-Тодорова (child psychologist)	⚠ LIVE, ratify or pull	Ivo	⚠ It shipped while the decision it was escalated for was still open, on the default-allow. In its favour, and it is not small: the page states four facts and nothing else, ships zero photographs by decision (a stock child on a child-psychologist page is an implied claim about her clients), the call and message buttons are visibly inert with a „coming“ chip rather than a fake number, the form prints „nothing was sent“ instead of a false confirmation, and the regulated-claim sweep is clean on the live bytes. Ratify it or pull it - but it is live either way
🏭 The Pattaya batch, 19 Aug - 19 live and unsent, 3 stopped before code, all unpriced, nobody contacted, day 2
Pattaya Night Bazaar (management company, not an owner)	🔴 LIVE - DO NOT SEND, UNPATCHED	Ivo	🔴 The only person who can send is NOT in this channel. The live page animates the rating 4.2 and the review count 23,669 and carries no translate guard. Static markup first, then a guard on every wordmark. ⚠ The requester’s premise was wrong - they asked for three more languages and the page already ships seven - so re-brief before rebuilding
The Sanctuary of Truth Museum (has its own site - never pitch „no website“)	🔴 LIVE - DO NOT SEND, UNPATCHED	Ivo	Animates rating and reviews the same way and carries no translate guard. All three pitch wedges are gone, so the argument has to be measured defects, not absence. Inside the unruled attraction group
Love In Museum (erotic art museum)	✅ RULED + LIVE - ordinary unsent row	Ivo	✅ Cleared out of the unruled group on three binding conditions: no badge, owner photographs only, no age claim. It is now an ordinary live-and-unsent row rather than an escalation
Pattaya Elephant Village (stopped before code)	🛑 NOT BUILT - escalated, gate unruled	Ivo	🔴 The only person who can send is NOT in this channel. Back-riding on the profile. Standing recommendation: DROP. The empty address is correct - there is no object, so its non-answer is the right answer
Tiger Park & Snake Show (both stopped before code)	🛑 NOT BUILT - escalated, gate unruled	Ivo	Both stopped at the animal-welfare gate before a line of code, both escalated, both still unruled. Stopping there is the cheapest possible place to stop, and their empty addresses are correct rather than broken. ⚠ The rep is not in either channel
The other 15 Pattaya pages (cafes, parks, aquarium, museums, paramotor)	LIVE, unsent, unpriced, nobody contacted	Ivo	All fifteen verified serving this morning. This is the whole of bucket (3) - genuinely unasked: fifteen live pages, fifteen real businesses, not one person contacted, on day 2. ⚠ Several carry inversions that must survive into any pitch: three have their own sites, one is a successor to a permanently closed cafe at the same address (so 5.0 from 20 reviews means NEW, not weak - do not price down on review count), and one relocated and says so on its own profile, so it must never be pitched as a new opening. 🔴 Nine of the batch sit in channels the only sender cannot see

Cold inventory + how reps will own it

About 32 speculative demos built and live with no named recipient, plus about 75 tracked deployed-but-unsent in client channels = about 107 built and in front of nobody, against a cap of 5. MOVEMENT THIS WINDOW: NONE IN, ONE OUT - the first zero-build window since 18 Aug, and the one departure is a re-send to a couple the rep had spoken to by phone. A second row leaves the board separately as a client-requested take-down, which is not a send. ✅ All ~107 are actually serving: 149 of 158 addresses answered this morning and none of the nine exceptions is a dead object - two are known wrong-host lookups whose correct addresses both answer, three are builds correctly stopped before code, two are the new address redirecting as designed, and two are a terminal declined row and a name that was never registered. ⚠ THE 16 AUGUST RULING STILL GOVERNS WHAT THIS COUNT MEANS: it is THREE piles, not one, and only one of them is a send queue. (1) FREE BY DECISION - the build was given away deliberately and no ask exists: the Finnish log-homes client, traded against introductions to our other product; the Pattaya gym, told it is free with the footer as the upsell; the German office client, whose site is the partner’s own; the nail studio, ruled a free barter demo by the person who owns sub-€1k pricing. (2) NO COUNTERPARTY - there is nobody at the other end to ask: the Bangkok bakery bar, who never answered „owner or manager“; the whole Bangkok restaurant batch, never reached at all. (3) GENUINELY UNASKED - the real queue, and the entire Pattaya batch sits here: nineteen live pages, nineteen real businesses, not one person contacted, now on day 2. ⚠ Two of the nineteen are DO-NOT-SEND until patched, and nine sit in channels the only sender cannot see, so „unsent“ understates the position rather than overstating it. Read the composition rather than the number. Yesterday is the clean counter-proof from the other direction: the factory built nothing at all and the pile still only fell by one, because building was never the constraint and neither is stopping. The constraint is a person handing a page over, which happened once in this window and four times in the last twelve days. Inventory to split, assign or archive, not a queue to blast. Ivo / Elena

Removed / parked / churned

ONE DEPARTURE THIS WINDOW, AND IT CAME FROM THE CLIENT RATHER THAN FROM US: the children’s party client asked for her live page to be taken offline and kept for a later stage, because she has no registered company yet and it worries her. That is a soft no plus an explicit un-publish request; the row is Parked and reversible on registration, the relationship is a friendly one, and the page is still up eleven hours later, which is why it also appears as an open item above rather than as a closed one. Nothing else was declined, parked or churned, and nothing has left the revenue base for a fourteenth consecutive window - the base holds at 17 rows. One row moved the other way: a couple who had been a park candidate was re-sent after a phone call and is back in the warm table. Three arrivals remain correctly REFUSED rather than admitted: the snake show, the tiger park and the elephant village were stopped before a line of code on brand-safety grounds and escalated, which is the cheapest possible place to stop and is why their addresses correctly return nothing - there is no object, not a broken one. One row remains off the board by replacement rather than removal: the Свети Влас page built under the wrong brand is retired, its address must not be sent, and the correct page lives at a new one - but the retired address is still serving the wrong business, which is why it is a live risk above rather than a closed item. Standing terminal rows are unchanged: the mobile tyre service churned on 03 Aug and still has no clean close, the detailing client was retired by decision, and the barbershop, the park restaurant, the Karlovo hotel and the car service all declined earlier in the summer with their sources retained and reversible. ✅ No row on this board is off air - this morning’s 158-address sweep found zero genuine dead objects for the third consecutive run.

Stages: Lead → Qualified → Demo built → Deployed → Sent → Replied → Won → Care. Terminal: Declined / Parked / Churned. Owners: Ivo price/money/scope/domains; Elena sub-€1k price, send, client comms; Ivo/Elena shared; rep ambassador. Sources: the journey-state spine (21 Aug 06:40 reconcile, live column re-verified across 158 addresses in a clean scratch directory with caching and compression defeated: 149 answered, zero genuine dead objects, third consecutive run) + confirmed facts (16 Aug) + the money book and its structured per-payment layer (25 rows, grain = one payment) + the agents’ own run-state + the full client-channel roster re-enumerated to the end of results (123 active, FLAT). Morning pass: the spine was written at 06:40 today, so the rows above are a fresh derivation rather than yesterday’s reading carried forward. Open-item count excludes „✅ closed“ entries: 20 rows rendered, 27 tracked items, 9 blockers, with the two biggest closures of the month landing in this window - the first client address on our own namespace, and the six-day wrong-number defect. Internal use only - do not share outside the venture.