Internal operating board. Single authoritative view of where every client is. Human-confirmed facts sit ABOVE the agents (confirmed-facts), so a thing you explain once is not re-raised. Every item is a record or an alert; a person acts (owner tagged). Refreshes twice daily. YESTERDAY WAS A DELIVERY DAY, NOT A BUILD DAY, AND IT PRODUCED THE BIGGEST SINGLE BUILD FEE THE VENTURE HAS TAKEN. Nothing was built and nothing was sent; instead nine client edits shipped across six channels and the music atelier CONVERTED at 600 for the build, paid straight to Ivo, with 24/mo care from September. That is the first money since 03 Aug and it moves her into the revenue base. Four inference gaps closed with real answers: the coffee shop's trade prices and opening hours are now CONFIRMED figures rather than transcript readings, and the travel agency's phone is live on the page with the naming question answered on evidence. THE THING WORTH READING TWICE IS THAT THE HOTEL BLOCKER CHANGED SIDES. Brilliantin paid in full on 07 Jul and is now DAY 30 with no real-domain go-live. Until yesterday that was excused as waiting on the client's own registrar access; Elena's answer removed the excuse, she wants a NEW domain, which is our purchase, not their access. The domain-registration float is under thirty cents. Three go-lives now queue behind a top-up smaller than the thing it is blocking. One defect worth naming: a client note landed at 23:09 and is still unprocessed this morning, which is the manual-intake cost showing as a real client waiting.
confirmed-facts.md = human ground truth above the agents. Authority order: confirmed-facts > payments platform > ledger > client channels > memory.
#1 BLOCKER - the domain-registration float (~€0.25) is the last thing between a FULLY PAID client and its go-live, day 30. Brilliantin paid 350 build plus 120 of care in advance on 07 Jul. Thirty days later there is still no real-address go-live. Until yesterday the explanation held, it was waiting on the CLIENT's registrar access. Elena's 12:58 answer removed it: „сайта е нов с нов домейн трябва да е" - she wants a NEW domain, and a new domain is OUR purchase, not their permission. The float cannot buy one. Two more go-lives sit in the same queue: the coffee shop asked outright to launch its domain, and the friend-build's domain pick has been waiting since 26 Jul. Three go-lives, one tap, around fifty clears it. This was carried as a standing item for six days while it was theoretical; it stopped being theoretical when a paid deliverable started ageing behind it. Whichever domain Elena names, the purchase fires the same day the float is topped up. Ivo
#2 BLOCKER - the hosting estate is at its 100-address hard cap with ZERO headroom. The next build cannot go live. Our own client namespace binds one address per site and the zone is full. All three pre-approved evictions are spent, the last consumed by the ninth build of 04 Aug. Nothing was built yesterday, so nothing hit the wall - which is the danger, because a blocker that costs nothing on a delivery day costs everything on a building day, and the next site ready to ship stops dead. Until it is fixed every new site needs Ivo to personally name an existing client address to delete first. The permanent fix is known, cheap and unchanged: a single wildcard address plus a route (routes are NOT capped) plus automatic per-host certificates, which removes the ceiling for good. It is blocked on ONE credential - the hosting token carries no certificate scope, so the enabling call returns forbidden. Escalated on four consecutive builds inside one day and unanswered for a second day. It is the only item on this board that STOPS the factory rather than slowing it. Ivo
Video hosting on live sites - day 15, and it has already cost a client. The deploy pipeline serves only a single page file plus one share image, so a client video cannot be hosted on any live site. Both client-APPROVED publishes (20 Jul) hit that wall; one of the two churned on 03 Aug. The survivor is the e-scooter shop at ~2.5 weeks and it was untouched again yesterday while nine other client edits shipped: its PHOTOS can ship the standard way as placeholders and should, which removes most of the visible silence; the VIDEO still waits on the platform decision (host as separate page assets vs an external host). The in-house media namespace CAN serve arbitrary files and likely provides the video path - a build decision, flagged not assumed. Escalated 23 Jul; do NOT auto-retry into the same wall. Ivo
Churn tail on the mobile-service client - three clean-close calls, now 3 days unanswered. Elena closed him out on 03 Aug: „този вече не ние клиент". He had been Won since June: build 5 x 20 with the first 20 collected 04 Jul, care 15/mo with month 1 collected in cash 17 Jul. What needs Ivo: (a) his domain sits on our registration account, hold it or let it lapse; (b) the site is still serving, keep it up or take it down; (c) roughly 80 of remaining build instalments, write off or pursue. NOT cancelled by the churn: Elena still holds €35 of his cash (build instalment 1 plus care month 1) which must still be remitted. NB if the domain is dropped, that also frees one address slot against the cap above. The causal note, stated plainly and not as a scold: the care-delivery pass had flagged him the day before precisely because a PAYING client's own APPROVED deliverable had sat unpublished ~2 weeks. The e-scooter shop is the last client in that exact condition. Ivo
Payment rail (binding, standing) - the structural blocker, and the new win added a leg to it running the other way. No switched-on route for cash to reach the company. Cash held by Elena: the Kiten annual care prepay (120) + the churned client's build instalment 1 (20) + his care month 1 (15) = €155 gross, plus Food Addiction if cash. The atelier's 600 build was paid directly into Ivo's own account, so that leg runs OPPOSITE to the blocked rail - it is not waiting on the petty-cash handover, it is his to pay out, and Elena's 30% build commission on it (180) is due and unbooked. Third off-platform collection in three weeks, which is now a pattern rather than an exception: the books are being reconstructed from messages. The 22 Jun decision (Elena nets her commission, remits the surplus as monthly petty cash, books gross / commission / net) is chosen but not switched on - confirm the monthly handover + the accountant check. Covers the ambassador 60% leg too. Stated once, not per client. Ivo
RULED-GATE COLLISION - the coffee shop asked to launch its domain and nothing has been paid. Elena, 23:09: „и давай да пускаме домейна". But the build is 300 in three instalments of 100, the FIRST is already past its „start of August" date and UNPAID, and care 24/mo is DEFERRED TO the brand-and-domain launch. So going live now bills exactly nothing and hands over the asset. That is the precise shape the 22 Jun rule exists to prevent (no real-address go-live until the first care payment is secured; billing starts with go-live, never chase after), and it is the dynamic that produced the hotel-services chase. Two clean ways forward and they belong to different people: Elena collects the first 100 and starts the care, or Ivo waives the gate deliberately for this client. What must not happen is the next sweep deciding it by default because nobody said. It is blocked on the float regardless. Ivo/Elena
The music atelier converted at 600 - three bookkeeping moves, no sales move. Elena, 12:51: „Нина плати към Иво 600 евро за сайта - месечна грижа ще е 24 евро и ще започне от септември". The deal that was DEFERRED to September closed in August instead: 600 build, PAID, straight to Ivo, and 24/mo care starting September. First money since 03 Aug and the highest single build fee the venture has taken. Three things follow and none involve the client: (a) book the 600, it moved off-platform with no trail; (b) Elena's founding build share is 30%, so 180 is owed on this and is NOT in the commission ledger - she closed it outright; (c) set the September recurring charge up BEFORE the month starts rather than chasing it after, which is the whole reason the go-live-after-care rule exists. Worth recording against the flag she carried: this brief changed four times in four days and it did not cost the deal, it closed at full price. The churn was the client thinking, not the client cooling. Ivo
Elena not in the client channel - FIVE channels, and ZERO were fixed in 24 hours. Re-verified this morning by reading the member list on each rather than trusting any log: all five return a member count of one, the bot only. The list: the petrol station, the psychotherapy practice, one Thai warm build, the log homes, and Бирария Маки - now on its second day as a live demo built from her OWN overnight lead, with the link and the ready send text sitting where she cannot see them, despite Ivo sending her the join link on 04 Aug at 11:56 and naming the pattern himself („системата не те добави при създаването, ПЕТИ ПЪТ"). Five one-click repairs, and only Ivo (admin) can add her to an existing channel. The auto-add itself now wants a tool-level fix, because this is the fifth recurrence and repeated manual repair is not a fix. Ivo
LIVE-SITE DEFECT on a delivered client - every Bulgarian sentence on the adviser's site is drawn by the visitor's own device. Found while building her post artwork, not by looking for it: the page declares a body typeface that ships NO Cyrillic characters at all, so the browser silently substitutes whatever the device happens to have. It reads as handwritten in one browser and as something else again on the next phone. It was not introduced by us and it was NOT fixed in that pass, because a typeface swap on a live client page is its own job, not a sweep tail. It sits on a client who now has a live site, a print-ready card, twenty posts and finished artwork delivered with still no price quoted and nothing sent. It also confirms the house-wide letterform item further down this board is real rather than theoretical. Ivo
Condio - the delivered pile keeps growing and there is still no price attached to any of it. Yesterday added card v4 built to her own directions („ЕКСПЕРТ ПО ДИВИДЕНТНО ПЕНСИОНИРАНЕ" leads under the photo and on the card, the formal adviser line stays as the descriptor and structured data, her slogan „Как парите да работят за вас" replaces the old hero line), the site redeployed and verified in a real browser in both languages, and the first 3 of 20 post graphics built - deliberately three, not twenty, because if the register is wrong we have burned three. The item is unchanged and getting heavier: a site, a print-ready card, twenty posts and now artwork delivered with NO price ever quoted and nothing sent. Decide the commercial frame before more work goes in. Two carried threads: the wordmark is still OUR PROPOSAL and wants her yes before any print run, and ownership is unreconciled, Ivo-brought commercially while Elena calls her „клиентката ми" and drives the revisions. Ivo
The two creator sites are finished and waiting on five facts from Ivo. Two English-only sites built for a large creator collective as pure quality proof, not as a client engagement, on the theory that the work itself is the argument and his small-creator audience is the real prize. Both live, deliberately unlike each other, both untouched for two days. One correction on record: the brief described the first channel as gaming and meme content, and it is actually a long-form comedy podcast, so it was built to the real channel and not to the brief. The second needs FIVE facts before it can move, none of them guessable: a business enquiry address for the pitch form (the video platform walls theirs behind a challenge), the merch storefront link, the second-platform handle, confirmation that the 602K subscriber figure is fine to display since it drifts and is the only number on the page, and confirmation of the channel-art credit. Nothing sent, no price quoted. Review + send + price = Ivo. Ivo
Крушовица (Finnish log homes) - the critique is owed and the source file is literally unreadable. A seven-house development for the Bulgarian arm of a Finnish log-home maker, built off their OWN real logo, palette and drone photography taken from their brochure. The client already subscribes to Ivo's other product, so this is cross-product, not a cold demo. BLOCKED-ON, unchanged for two days: their final brochure PDF is 12.4 MB against the client-channel file read cap of 10 MB, so it has NOT been read and the material critique is still owed - Ivo drops it in the shared folder or straight into a chat. Commercially it is a different animal: the natural shape is a finite launch kit rather than a monthly retainer, nothing has been quoted, and seven units is a precision problem not a reach problem. Scope AND price = Ivo. Missing levers in order: the „from X" anchor per house model, the real site plan with per-plot areas, completion date and build stage, the payment scheme in writing, a named contact with phone and photo for viewings. Elena is not a member of the channel. Ivo
ЯТО (travel agency) - both open items CLOSED with evidence; what is left is her name decision and one price confirm. The PHONE is live: +359 88 966 77 59 now renders as real click-to-call links in two places plus the structured data, and the „предстои да се добави" placeholder returns zero hits on the live page. The NAMING question was answered on facts rather than opinion, and the answer saved a real mistake: „Яна Травел" is a HARD COLLISION, held since 2012 by a licensed Varna tour operator with its own domain, so adopting it means fighting a fourteen-year-old licensed agency for her own name with liability confusion running both ways; „Nova Travel" is unclaimed exactly but generic and sits beside a similar operator. The correction underneath it is the useful part: a name does not make a site rank - one page per route with real dates, prices and inclusions does, plus a verified business listing and reviews. Recommended: keep ЯТО (both domains free) or ВИА ЯНА. A 26-question client questionnaire was delivered inline for pasting straight into chat and productised for every future travel build. Left: her name decision, then Elena's send (sub-1k); and the one part that is NOT Elena's, the monthly she quoted on the call sits BELOW the €19 care floor and needs Ivo to confirm or correct. Hard guard standing and re-verified live: no licence, registration or company number anywhere, because she does not hold the operator licence yet. Ivo/Elena
Психопозитив - go-live + edits DONE; the open leg is COLLECTION. Ivo's own client (child psychotherapy; Мирела, sister of the Champions Lab founder), WON 28 Jul: 300 build + 29/mo care, both confirmed, both UNPAID. Go-live is DONE and the client's eight-edit batch was SHIPPED and LIVE-VERIFIED on 01 Aug - the served page carries every marker and the phone-digit gate is RESOLVED. What remains: collect the 300 + 29/mo via the payments re-auth OR a personal-account route, which has now proven three times over that it works. Two content gates (NOT blockers): the invoice for Мирела and her full cabinet address and email, which unlock the map, structured data and contacts. Ops note: the baseline still needs a manual unlock. Elena is STILL not a member of this channel, carried for a sixth run. Ivo
Payments platform on the wrong account, day 21 - and money keeps moving around it. The connector was not re-read (no payments tool in session, confirmed twice); the last live read on 25 Jul still showed the wrong company's account, and figures carried from the 01 Jul baseline are ~39 days stale. The pattern is now three consecutive collections routed around the platform - the consult, the hotel-services care, and this build - so the platform is no longer where the revenue record lives and the books are being reconstructed from messages. None of the three is wrong individually and each one worked; the risk is bookkeeping, not lost money. The live dependency is still the psychotherapy collection (300 + 29/mo), which needs either the re-auth or the same personal route. On re-auth it also clears the housekeeping: identify the unmapped €19/mo sub, cancel Elena's old 5/mo gift sub (her card is blocked, so no interim leak), retire the two redundant links, and set September's 24/mo up before the month starts. Ivo
Champions Lab - stale 51 days on Ivo's own step, and this week's churn showed what that costs. Build paid 16 Jun; care (19/mo incl 10 social) never started - zero channel activity since 16 Jun, blocked on domains-to-choose + photo fine-tune + social. Care link fires on her domain pick. The oldest open revenue leak in the book, re-stamped by the stale-loop watchdog, and the likeliest owner of the unmapped €19/mo sub - if so, it is being charged with nothing delivered. Her sister's Психопозитив is live off the same point of contact, so the two are worth closing together. Ivo
Unidentified €19/mo sub (standing) - charged ~12 Jul, still unidentified. One €19/mo card sub has no name or email attached. With the Kiten care confirmed as annual CASH (not a card sub), this narrows toward the sports-club client (recorded care-unpaid) rather than a double-collect. Identify it in the payments dashboard directly after re-auth; if a double-collect, the refund is Ivo's gate. Ivo
Rungrueang Oil - photo add-on on Ivo's own family site, still waiting on the file-drop (day 4). Ivo posted 8 real pump and food photos on 02 Aug asking to add them to his family petrol site (the first petrol vertical, live and greenfield). They cannot be embedded from where they are: the client channel renders the images but yields no downloadable file bytes, and they are not on the mounted folder. The one-step fix is already posted in the channel - drop the same 8 into the shared client-photo folder („Rungrueang Oil") and the next sweep embeds them, redeploys, verifies both language versions and posts the link. Unchanged for four days. His own family site, so review, send, price and domain are all his gate. Elena is also still not a member of this channel. Ivo
Ivo's Thailand + petrol review queue - 13 builds, all unpriced (his own leads). Eight Bangkok restaurant demos (Curry Hub, D'ARK, Baan Ice, Jumbo Seafood, RotRueDee, FLOW, Shakariki432, getfresh), plus Ton Hom, Son Charoennakhon, Jeera Kitchen, the Chonburi warm build and his family's petrol station - all live, each channelled with the link posted, all verified serving. Send + price + go-live = Ivo on every one. Flags: four are off-profile chains with existing corporate sites (Jumbo, FLOW, Shakariki, getfresh) so they are PORTFOLIO-ONLY, do-not-send-as-is, verify the target first; D'ARK is a displacement prospect. The greenfield ones carry the badge and are send-ready. Inventory on Ivo's own queue, NOT a gate. Ivo
Sasiprapa (Ivo's own client) - pre-send confirms before it goes out. The live Bangkok-gym site ships DRAFT pricing („from THB400" + ask-us, because directories conflict) and multi-source hours - confirm both with Thakoon before sending. Fresh on-site photos are a standing offer. Send + price = Ivo only. Ivo
Auto-service (Farzando) - real logo + poster facts are live, but the literal poster and the phone stay blocked (tooling). The real logo (recreated) and the poster facts were applied to the live demo 24 Jul. Still blocked: the literal poster image 1:1 and the phone number, because the client-channel file bytes are not extractable here and the mounted auto-service subfolder is empty. Fix = a channel file-download token, or connect the newer client-photo parent folder. Same root cause as the petrol-station photo item above and the recurring „I have no folder" asks. Ivo
BusinessTax / Terzieva - access-handover window EXPIRED (~15 Jul), nothing recorded. The incumbent developer holding the one hosting account (both sites) plus the registrar relocated abroad on his window. Establish from Niki whether the access and the files-and-database archive were actually taken; if not, agree which route replaces it (he remains reachable and cooperative). Both sites live and unaffected; only future address repoints are at risk. Care for both also untriggered (each picks 19 or 29). Ivo
Social add-on price still unset (blocking 3), and a fourth client has now received artwork too. Monthly social packs are shipping (Kiten, Food Addiction, e-scooter) with no priced add-on line, and the business adviser has had 20 posts of copy PLUS the first three finished graphics delivered with no price attached at all. The remaining seventeen graphics are deliberately held pending Ivo's go, which is the right call while there is no price - but it also means a pricing decision is now gating real production, not just paperwork. Set the standard monthly social-content price so it can be billed (new price = Ivo's gate). Ivo
The waiting queue is down to ONE item, and it has been sitting overnight on a live conversation. Everything posted before 17:21 on 05 Aug was processed and closed by the three human-triggered sweeps that day. The single unprocessed item is the coffee shop's 23:09 note, a long voice message plus five written asks, now about eight hours old. Field intake is manual BY DECISION, taken to save tokens, and that decision stands - so this is inventory, not a broken loop. The honest consequence is that a note arriving overnight waits for the first human-triggered run of the morning, which means the cost is not tokens, it is response time on live client conversations. Worth deciding deliberately rather than rediscovering each morning: either an early trigger is part of the routine, or overnight notes are accepted as next-morning work and Elena is told so plainly. Ivo/Elena
Karnobat coffee shop - the brief is CLOSED OUT, five new asks arrived overnight, and only money is genuinely open. Two more full passes shipped yesterday. Round 2 took the scope NATIONAL to her eight-point list: the town name is out of the mark and the headline (badge and wordmark now read BULGARIA) and survives only as the outlet address, new headline „Вашето бутиково кафе в цяла България", a repeatable „Нашите обекти" section so the next outlet is copy-paste, and online ordering carrying his promise verbatim („наложен платеж до всяка точка в България") with no invented price. Round 3 hard-confirmed the facts: trade prices CONFIRMED at 30 retail / 24 wholesale, EUR, per KILOGRAM, and hours CONFIRMED 9:00-23:00 daily and shipped into the structured data. Both were transcript-only inferences and both are now closed. NEW and unprocessed from 23:09: swap the chocolate photo for the new one in the shared folder (the old one was removed), re-crop the logo, replace the bad white and pink packet shots, use „гр." rather than „г" sitewide, and build a black business card with the mark in white carrying the phone, the names and the site. Also open and worth her one word: the record says 300 EUR while the 05 Aug channel post says „3x100 лв" (~153) - she owns the sub-1k price, so she settles which is real, then the first instalment date, then send. Elena
Brilliantin - twelve real professional photos are LIVE, and the domain is now a two-option question she can just answer. Her note („клиента е сложил снимките в папката") turned out to have been true since 01 Aug: twelve professional restaurant photos uploaded by the client's own photographer had been sitting in the shared folder, never pulled, invisible to the local mount. All twelve were downloaded, viewed one by one and wired in - the pergola terrace is now the restaurant's feature image and the gallery went from seven tiles to thirteen, with the weak frames replaced. Two detail shots were deliberately dropped to hold page weight, because embedded photos cannot be lazy-loaded so tile count IS page weight. The domain is now a choice, not a stall: their own hotel address answers but still serves their OLD site, so the repoint never happened; path (a) needs their registrar and hosting access, which is human hands, and path (b) is a fresh .com that fires the same day she names one, subject to the top-up at the top of this board. Also asked plainly: a 314 MB archive and a 49 MB archive in the same folder cannot be unpacked from a sweep, so 10 to 15 selected images instead. Build + 6 months of care already PAID; this is delivery, not collection. Elena
Two of the seven overnight leads are still HELD for one word from Elena - both are displacement, not greenfield. The has-site pre-check ran on all seven of her leads before anything was built, and two came back with real, working sites of their own: Ресторант Орешака runs a full site with menus, contacts and reservations, and Сладкарски цех „Сладки мечти" runs a bilingual site with a retail-stores page and about twenty years of trading behind it. Both were deliberately NOT built, because building a greenfield demo for a business that already has a site is the wrong pitch. If she still wants them, the answer is a DISPLACEMENT build, a side-by-side against what they have now, and one word from her starts it. Everything else in her batch is live. Elena
Five new Sliven demos are live and in front of nobody - they need her review and her send. All five came from her own overnight requests and all five are hers to price and send (sub-1k): Ресторант „Белица" (10 real photos, zero stock, no logo exists so the mark is OUR PROPOSAL and needs their yes; hours are nowhere official so none were published), Pizza-Bar ХИТ (brand-new business, identity resolved by matching the phone across two independent sources), Вила Вилекула (a RESTAURANT, not accommodation, so the commission pitch was correctly dropped), При Хаджията and Бирария Маки (both resolved from bare map pins in a browser before building, and checked against each other so the same business was not built twice). Each has its own channel with the live link posted and a photo-drop folder - except Бирария Маки, which she cannot see at all until the membership above is fixed. Two days now, no movement. Elena
Elena's collection / send lane (sub-1k, not Ivo's queue). Coffee Delmar - WON and live on its own real domain: collect the 100 build + start care 15/mo WITH the August go-live (do not let it slip) + push annual upfront (brother of Rakadiko). Rakadiko - thirteen prices were updated yesterday from her own list and one dish renamed, so the delivery lane is clear and ONLY money is open: care month 1 (15) DUE since the 04 Jul go-live, now 33 days late, plus the annual push. Four rounds of edits shipped in a week against a care month never collected. Shano Design - review + pick the name from the five proposals + collect photos, logo and contacts; no movement since 01 Aug. Kiten - remit the held annual cash on the rail. „Sparks of Joy" - pick the domain (registers on pick, blocked on the top-up) + send. Family Hotel Kontesa, Божура, Paradise Velingrad, Farzando, ГИК-8, КОНТО им, Tako Gumi - review + send. Color Kitchen Studio - last touch well overdue. Elena
Food Addiction - card vs cash, confirm so we never double-collect. The 01 Jul baseline shows BOTH the €40/mo build sub and the €19/mo care sub active on card, while the human record notes monthly cash to Elena. Confirm which is real (it cannot be re-checked while the connector reads the wrong account). Elena
Hotel-services care - the client is CLOSED and the record has now CAUGHT UP. One fair question remains. Settled at 200 for the year by Ivo's 04 Aug ruling, and she is not to be approached again this year. Closed this morning: the payments file no longer carries the stale „28 EUR gap UNRECONCILED" row that the last two runs flagged - the file now matches the ruling, so the next due-check will not be misled. Do not re-raise it. What is genuinely still open is one commission question, and it is not the client's problem: the ledger lists that account as Ivo-collected and excludes it from Elena, yet Elena closed the care and drove the collection. Standard 40% (€80), or stays excluded? No commission is booked until Ivo says. Ivo
August care cycle - monthly update-requests still not sent (day 6). The SOP date for the monthly care update-request is the 1st, and none has gone to any care client (Kiten, Food Addiction, e-scooter, Rakadiko, Brilliantin - the sixth on that list churned on 03 Aug). Slipping rather than in breach, but this is exactly the delivery visibility whose absence just cost a client, and it is the cheapest churn insurance available. Two of them got substantial real work yesterday (thirteen prices on the grill, twelve professional photos on the hotel) which is precisely the substance an update-request is supposed to surface, so for those two the message writes itself. Elena
The link rule is now doctrine - the link IS the message. Ivo's rule, adopted 05 Aug: every asset post, every channel, direct messages included, carries a clickable link to the thing being announced - the client's own shared folder or the live address, never a repository path. A path opens nothing on a phone in Pattaya and nothing on Elena's laptop, so a status update naming only a path is a silent bottleneck wearing a progress report's clothes. Written into the operating brain and the asset-handoff standard, both read at the start of every sweep and every build, so it binds without anyone having to remember it. One honest gap remains: it could NOT be written into the sweep's own task file, which is read-only from here, and reconstructing that file from memory was refused deliberately rather than risk damaging the guard inside it that already cost two of Elena's notes once. Hard-wiring it there needs a session with write access. Ivo
Inventory over the send cap - flat, and it only moved because one converted. ~32 cold spec demos plus ~40 tracked Deployed-but-unsent in client channels = ~72 built, live and in front of nobody, against a cap of 5. It fell by exactly one in 24 hours and not because anything was sent: the atelier simply converted. Zero builds and zero sends in a full delivery day. Seventeen of the tracked-unsent are Ivo's own (the 14 Thailand and petrol builds, the 2 creator sites, the log homes); the five Sliven builds plus the older Bulgarian demos are Elena's. Worth restating because it is a rule and not an oversight: the cap counts COLD speculative demos only, and every one of this week's warm builds is a named prospect that Elena or Ivo will send personally, so none of them was capped or should have been. But warm inventory converts to nothing until somebody sends it. Assign, send, or archive. Ivo/Elena
The send engine has had nothing to do for seven weeks, because nothing has been sent. The cadence run reports zero nudges due and zero interest signals, and the reason is not that the loop is broken - it is that no lead has been marked Sent since ~25 Jun, so there is no clock to run. The Karlovo wave still reads 3 of 10 sent and 0 replied, unchanged since 14 Jun; the remaining seven never went out at all, and one of them had already AGREED to receive the link and never got it. Everything sent long ago has passed its single nudge and dropped onto the slow seasonal ladder. Stated the way it actually is: sending is the constraint, not building - nine sites in one day, nine client edits the next, against a send engine idling for seven weeks. Ivo/Elena
Iskash da hapnesh - still no tracked channel (re-verified absent from all 75 active client channels this morning); the client is at „closing" - a real client at the closing stage with no tracking. Confirm where it is tracked or open a channel. Elena/Ivo
Cadence - drive or park. Elegance PARKED (revisit 30d / next season). Kalina i Milan ~7 weeks silent - last touch then park. I & M Mebel past +51 days on its single nudge - park if still silent. SK Gong re-intro still UNSENT - send or park. Malkiya Yavor offer email (46 days, drafted in-channel and unsent; the stale-loop watchdog re-stamped it „you are the only blocker"). TeachyPlanet - get the point-of-contact number from Niki (~7 weeks). Varna Spa - check with Galin (46 days). Ivo/Elena
Interest capture (standing, ~51 days). On-site interest capture is still not wired (blocked on Ivo's worker token), so every live site falls back to plain email and only an explicit reply is visible - no open or interest signal reaches the send engine at all. NB the factory token now carries the wider scope added for the new namespace, but as the cap blocker above shows it still lacks certificate rights, so the two credential asks are worth issuing together. Ivo
Memory-index hygiene + spawned-build defect (standing). The agents' index file is approaching its read cap; a consolidation pass is due as its own session so recall stays sharp. Related and newly evidenced: a plain read of the field-notes channel now overflows the tool's token cap because the bot posts full demo cards there, so reads have to be narrowed to human messages first, and a date-worded search silently returns nothing where a numeric one works. Spawned build sessions also keep ending before their own deploy-and-post step - the sweeps catch each one, but it is worth a tool-level fix, and a session's self-report is never taken as evidence. Ivo
Bulgarian letterforms - one house decision, then a sweep. It is no longer theoretical. With Bulgarian set as the page language many typefaces switch several Cyrillic letters to their handwritten forms, which reads as a different font than intended, and only a rendered screenshot shows it - markup checks pass on visibly wrong output. There is now a live example on a real client page, where the declared body typeface carries no Cyrillic at all and every Bulgarian sentence is drawn by the visitor's own device. Decide it once as a house default, then sweep the estate. The tooling half is solved and reusable: per-character font fallback plus a gate that refuses to draw any string the font cannot render, built after a first cut shipped empty boxes for every comma and full stop. Ivo
Project-slot prune (merged into the address-cap blocker). The old hosting account is at its 100-project cap and every demo already published to the new namespace still holds its old project. Deleting the superseded projects reclaims those slots; deleting a retired client's ADDRESS binding is what was buying room for each new build until the last one was spent. Both are housekeeping that the wildcard fix at the top of this board makes permanent rather than repeated. Each prune batch + the factory flip is its own Ivo go. Ivo
