Northr - Client Journey & Loop Board

Internal operating board. Single authoritative view of where every client is. Human-confirmed facts sit ABOVE the agents (confirmed-facts), so a thing you explain once is not re-raised. Every item is a record or an alert; a person acts (owner tagged). Refreshes twice daily; this is the evening pass of 22 August. Read the day in one line: the queue is not blocked on capacity, it is blocked on three sentences, and today produced none of them. This morning’s pass said the split was clean - things needing a person to do a thing got done inside a day, things needing a decision about money did not move. Twelve hours later that is measured rather than inferred for a third time: the partner page still publishes the old commission rate at the identical 20,037 bytes, the retired address still serves the wrong business at the identical 1,316,093 bytes, and the €100 the book and the owner disagree about is untouched. ⚠ Both nudges are now unserved: the +5 missed on 21 August is two days late, and the +2 that fell today has run out of day. ⚠ And the nightly reconcile fired this morning and produced no spine, so every counter here is derived from direct measurement, not from a fresh read. The two standing numbers are unchanged: ~107 pages built and in front of nobody, one of which is deliberately off air, and €3,105 to €3,305 outside a clean company account.

READ FIRST - #1 BLOCKER, UNCHANGED AND NOW SIX DAYS INTO A STATUTORY OVERDUE: EVERY CLIENT PAYMENT LINK THIS VENTURE HAS EVER MINTED SITS IN AN ENTITY IVO HAS RULED OUT, AND THAT ENTITY IS LATE ON A FILING. The money half is his own ruling: the shared entity behind that account has other partners who would have a claim on anything routed through it. Exposure is €350 confirmed, a further €200 unresolved between two destinations, and beneath them live recurring charges on older accounts that have been running for months and have never been counted. The legal half is a clock and it ticked again today: that entity’s annual confirmation statement went overdue on 17 Aug and is now six days late, and its accounts fall due on 31 Aug, nine days out. An overdue confirmation statement leads to strike-off action, and this is the same entity ruled the public-facing name on the business listings. ⚠ And the replacement route is not available either: the new company’s registration was REJECTED, so there is no clean destination to move any of this to. Four actions, all his: mint nothing further there; get a live read of that account to size the exposure; file the statement and the accounts; then decide what, if anything, is owed to the other partners. ⚠ Two finished pages below remain marked DO-NOT-SEND for an unpatched defect, day 3.

Won / care rows (nothing left, 15th window)

Agreed monthlies never once billed

€3.1-3.3k

Outside a clean account, countable per leg

~107

Built, unsent - one deliberately off air

Open items, 7 blockers (0 moved all day)

Loop health - did the agents run

Nightly reconcile

⚠ Amber, and this is a downgrade from this morning. It fired on cadence at 2026-08-22 ~06:38 BG and next runs 2026-08-23 ~06:37 BG, so the schedule is healthy - but 13 hours later it has still written no spine, which continues to stamp the 21 Aug 06:40 reconcile. Firing is not producing. This pass therefore derives from a two-day-old spine plus eight addresses re-checked directly on the wire at 19:25 tonight, and every day-counter below is that measurement, not a carried one. Yesterday’s live column remains the strongest read this board has carried: 158 addresses in a clean scratch directory with caching and compression defeated, 149 answered, none of the nine non-answers a defect.

Reply capture

Still switched off. Last ran 2026-06-29 ~21:22 BG, 54 days ago, and it has no next run because it is disabled rather than late. Known off-switch, not a fault - the nightly reconcile writes the signal log itself. 🔴 The consequence has now compounded into two unserved nudges in one day: the four demos sent on 16 August passed their +5 on 21 August and no nudge is recorded anywhere, so that is two days late; the couple re-sent on 20 August hit their +2 today and the day has run out. The family hotel’s promised call-back outcome from 17 August has still never been posted anywhere.

Care-delivery audit

Green, on cadence, and the quietest of the three because it only runs weekly. It ran Mon 2026-08-17 ~07:58 BG and next runs Mon 2026-08-24 ~06:48 BG, so its finding is five days old and will not be re-tested until Monday. That finding ages by a day each pass: the four-client August care gap is on day 22, on money already taken, with nine days of the month left. ⚠ Its remit is still too narrow - three further clients have an agreed monthly that has never once been billed, a shape this audit does not look for at all.

confirmed-facts = human ground truth above the agents; unchanged since 16 Aug, and the three-piles ruling it carries still governs how the unsent count is read. Authority order: confirmed facts, then money, then the acts log, then what was said in client channels, then the agents’ summary. Tonight the wire and the record agree everywhere they were tested, and where they agree it is because nothing changed - the two closures verified on Thursday were re-measured and still hold, and the three unmoved items were re-measured and are byte-identical for a third consecutive pass. Where earlier rulings retired a claim, the claim stays retired: the psychologist’s build is PAID, the hotel-services care question is CLOSED, and the September launch date belongs to the client, not to a bottleneck.

Needs action - open items (owner tagged)

#1 BLOCKER - THE RULED-OUT ENTITY HOLDS EVERY PAYMENT LINK WE HAVE EVER MINTED, IT IS SIX DAYS OVERDUE ON A STATUTORY FILING, AND THE REPLACEMENT COMPANY WAS REJECTED. The money half is Ivo’s own ruling: the shared entity behind that account has other partners with a claim on anything routed through it, exposure €350 confirmed plus €200 unresolved between two destinations, and live recurring charges on older accounts nobody has counted. The legal half is a clock: the confirmation statement went overdue 17 Aug and the accounts fall due 31 Aug, nine days out, on the entity just ruled the public-facing name on the business listings. Overdue statements lead to strike-off. And there is no clean destination waiting: the new company’s registration was refused, so „move it to the new entity“ is not currently an option. Mint nothing further there; get a live read to size it; file both; then decide what is owed to the other partners. Ivo

#2 BLOCKER - THE PARTNER COMMISSION CUT FROM 30% TO 20% IS CORRECT ON DISK AND STILL WRONG ON THE WIRE, NOW ~63 HOURS. RE-MEASURED TONIGHT, BYTE-FOR-BYTE UNCHANGED FOR A THIRD PASS. The local file, last touched 20 Aug at 04:41, reads 20% four times, 30% zero times at 19,761 bytes. The live partner page, measured again at 19:25 tonight, still reads 30% four times at 20,037 bytes - the identical byte count it served yesterday morning, this morning and now, so it has sat unchanged through three full board passes and one whole working day. The 20 Aug pass had marked this closed on the strength of a local diff only; that record was wrong and stays corrected. The gate condition is not met, so the partner’s €120 on the German guest-house chain stays blocked while the page still promises her the old rate. A commission rate is money, so no agent ships it: this is a one-tap yes from Ivo, not a stall. Ivo

#3 BLOCKER - A RETIRED ADDRESS IS STILL SERVING THE WRONG BUSINESS, DAY 8. RE-MEASURED TONIGHT, BYTE-FOR-BYTE UNCHANGED. At 19:25 tonight the old Свети Влас address still answers 200 at 1,316,093 bytes with the wrong brand 29 times and the correct brand zero times - the same byte count it has served since 14 Aug - while the correct page sits beside it at 200 / 1,513,920 bytes with the right brand 15 times. ✅ The correct link was handed to the rep on 20 Aug with Ivo’s own apology for three days unposted, so she now holds both, and one of them is a wrong-business page. That is one forward away from a live error. Retire or redirect the old address. Ivo

#4 BLOCKER - THE MONEY BOOK AND THE OWNER DISAGREE ON WHETHER A PAID INSTALMENT EXISTS. OPENED 20 AUG, NOW DAY 3 UNTOUCHED. Ivo wrote in the coffee client’s channel on 20 Aug at 15:21 that the terms are unchanged, „300 for the build in three instalments of 100, the first one in August, not yet charged“. The structured money book records that same €100 as RECEIVED on 15 Aug, in cash, collected by the rep, sourced to her own words in that same channel. One of the two is wrong. Nothing false was said to the client, so this costs nothing today - but it means either the book overstates collections by €100, or the owner does not know a rep is holding a paid instalment. Both are load-bearing. Book it or strike it, and one message to the client would settle it outright. Ivo / Elena

#5 BLOCKER - TWO FINISHED, LIVE PAGES CARRY A DEFECT THIS BOOK HAS ALREADY RULED ON TWICE, AND BOTH ARE STILL UNPATCHED ON DAY 3. The night-bazaar page animates the rating 4.2 and the review count 23,669; the museum page animates rating and reviews the same way. Both carry no translate guard on any wordmark. An animated number that is a factual claim can latch a false value - that is exactly how a page shipped a wrong rating - and browser auto-translate both freezes animated counters and rewrites brand strings. Static markup plus a guard on every wordmark, then they are sendable. Until then they are live and must not go anywhere. Ivo

#6 BLOCKER - €3,105 TO €3,305 SITS OUTSIDE A CLEAN COMPANY ACCOUNT, ACROSS FIVE HOLDERS PLUS TWO UNKNOWNS. Unchanged in size and countable leg by leg rather than estimated: a rep’s cash, two personal accounts belonging to Ivo, a partner’s personal account, a balance on the ruled-out entity, a door-opener holding cash recorded nowhere, and one instalment whose destination was never stated. The monthly handover this was supposed to run through has never once happened, and the company account it was supposed to land in does not exist because the registration was refused. Every new close makes this bigger. Ivo

#7 BLOCKER - THE ONLY PERSON WHO CAN PRICE AND SEND IS LOCKED OUT OF 21 CLIENT CHANNELS, NINE OF WHICH HOLD A FINISHED, LIVE DEMO. Carried and honestly stated as carried: no channel was created in this window, so the gap cannot have grown, and it was not re-measured today. The root cause is a missing capability, not a person forgetting - there is no way to add a member to an existing channel through the interface we drive; the invite works only at creation, and it was skipped on twelve of twenty-two creations in a single batch. Ivo escalated it in writing on 19 Aug. The 21 are manual one-clicks today; the recurrence needs a tool. Ivo

🔴 BOTH NUDGES ARE NOW UNSERVED, AND ONE OF THEM HAS RUN OUT OF DAY. The follow-up cadence is +2, +5, +10 then park. The four demos sent on 16 August reached their +5 on 21 August and no nudge is recorded anywhere, so that is two days late tonight. The couple re-sent on 20 August after a phone call to the owner’s wife hit their +2 today, and today is over. The agent that would have caught either is disabled by decision, so both were always going to need a person. The family hotel’s call-back outcome from 17 August still appears in no channel. Two sends and one missing outcome, still fifteen minutes of work, and it is the cheapest movement available on this board. Elena

CARE REVENUE HAS NEVER STARTED ON THREE CLIENTS WHO HAVE PAID FOR A BUILD. The psychologist: build €300 PAID, live on her own address 25 days, monthly €29 never once billed, and delivery is materially ahead of billing - a full September campaign and a ten-asset pack shipped into an unbilled plan. The German guest house: €49 recorded against €40 verbally offered, nothing mintable until the rep says which closed, and the client has asked for a payment link that cannot be produced (day 37). The coffee client: monthly figure still never restated, care starts September, which is nine days away. The excavator client: total build price and monthly fee recorded nowhere on a row that has taken a €100 deposit. ✅ The gym-and-hotel client’s September start is the client’s own decision, not a leak - do not re-flag it. Ivo / Elena

⚠ THE PAID MUSIC CLIENT IS LIVE ON HER OWN ADDRESS, BUT THE OLD TEMPORARY ADDRESS STILL COMPETES WITH IT, UNCHANGED ALL DAY. Re-measured tonight: her own address answers 200 at 155,441 bytes with her own title and rebranded name, and the temporary one still answers 200 at 155,499 bytes instead of redirecting. So the client who paid €600 has two live copies of her site, which splits her own search results against a duplicate. This is the same unarmed-redirect residual the food client has carried for weeks, and it is a minute’s work on each. Arm the redirect, then the search-indexing go-live is the only human step left before the September care start. Ivo

A NEW REP WAS PROMISED A RATE THE BOOK HAS ALREADY RULED AGAINST, AND IT IS NOW THREE DAYS OLD. The rep asked on 20 Aug at 18:28 for a referral code for a new name at 30%. The 22 June confirmed-fact fixes the new-rep standard at 10% build / 40% care; 30% build is grandfathered to four named earlier reps only. No code has been issued and no sale exists, so this costs a sentence today and a renegotiation after a close. Ivo

NOT ONE REP-COLLECTED PAYMENT HAS AN INDEPENDENT CLIENT CONFIRMATION, AND THE CONFIRMATION LOG HAS NEVER BEEN USED. Re-checked tonight: the file is 221 bytes, last written 21 June, never used since. Affected: €100 on 15 Aug, €100 on 16 Aug, €150 on 07 Aug, €120 on 22 Jul, €35 standing. No remittance of the company’s 60% has ever been reconciled, and the commission ledger last moved 18 Aug and does not carry three of those rows. This is the control that makes the cash rail auditable; without it, netting hides a leg, which is the exact thing the 22 June rule forbids. It is also the cheapest available answer to the disputed €100 above - an independent confirmation from the client would settle it in one message. Ivo / Elena

UNRULED OR UNBOOKED COMMISSION LEGS, ALL OF THEM IVO’S. The hotel-services care €200 - the ledger excludes the rep as an Ivo-collected account, yet she closed and chased it: 40% or excluded? Unruled since 04 Aug, 18 days. The annual care €150 - she closed and collected, unbooked. The coffee €100 - unbooked, and it is the same €100 two records disagree about. The music studio’s €180 and the guest house’s €180 chains are ruled but unpaid, and the music studio has now been live on her own address for a full day, which makes paying that chain harder to defer. ⚠ The guest house has three claimants on one deal, two with unproven attribution: if all three stacked, €390 of €600 leaves and the house keeps €12.25 a month on the stream doctrine calls the actual business. That is precisely why the pool is fixed and divided along the chain, never stacked. Ivo

A PILE OF SMALL ASKS THAT BELONG TO THE REP, RECORDED SO THEY ARE NOT LOST AND DELIBERATELY NOT ESCALATED. Whose number is the disputed reservations line (the hotel page ships with no call button until she answers); the Велинград price is internally contradictory in her own wording - „one-off 100 per month for the build“ - and needs one word before it is quoted; the Карнобат venue that went silent, let it lie or one last direct approach to a named owner; lev-versus-euro on the €300 build and again on the €150 annual care; whether the second orders contact’s card needs a job title and email; whether the consulting client’s second offer needs sharpening now that „free“ no longer differentiates it. Elena

ENTITY-LEVEL, AND NOT A WEBSITE PROBLEM. Beyond the overdue filing at the top of this board, our own public software-directory listing is owner-verified, is ours, and describes a product Northr does not sell - „a focus system for teams and individuals“, priced at $5/month, a figure that appears in no pricing ruling anywhere. It is a live public page with a wrong product and a wrong price on it. Ivo

✅ HOLDS - THE MUSIC-STUDIO CLIENT IS SERVING ON HER OWN ADDRESS, RE-VERIFIED TONIGHT. The day-16 breach on €600 already paid closed on Thursday evening and it has now held through a full day: 200 at 155,441 bytes, her own title, her rebranded name in the markup 15 times, zero foreign-tenant content. That check is not ceremony: the last address that went live was briefly pointed at a foreign biomedical firm and was caught only by opening it and reading what it served. The one residual, the unarmed redirect on the old temporary address, is promoted to its own amber item above rather than buried here. Ivo

✅ HOLDS - THE CLIENT-REQUESTED TAKE-DOWN IS STILL OFF AIR. The children’s-party client asked on 20 Aug for her live page to go offline and be kept for a later stage, because she has no registered company yet. It was honoured inside twenty-four hours and tonight it still returns Not Found. The row is Parked, reversible on registration. ⚠ One instruction for every future sweep, so nobody re-opens this as a fault: that non-answer is INTENDED. It is a client’s explicit ask honoured, not a dead object. Elena

⚠ NEW TONIGHT, PROCESS - THE NIGHTLY RECONCILE FIRED AND PRODUCED NOTHING, 13 HOURS AGO. The schedule is healthy: it ran at ~06:38 this morning and is queued for ~06:37 tomorrow. But the spine it exists to rebuild has not been written since 21 Aug 06:56, so the venture’s authoritative per-client record is two days old while its own run-state reports success. A run that fires is not a run that produced, and a board that trusted the timestamp alone would have re-served stale numbers as fresh ones. This pass measured instead. If tomorrow’s run also writes nothing, the reconcile is broken rather than late and needs looking at, not waiting on. Ivo

PROCESS - THE DIAGNOSIS IS NOW CONFIRMED OVER THREE PASSES, NOT TWO. Yesterday this board said the split was clean: items needing a person to do a thing got done inside a day, items needing a decision about money did not move. A full working day later the two done things are still done and the three undone things are byte-identical on the wire for a third consecutive measurement. The queue is not blocked on capacity, it is blocked on three sentences from Ivo, and two of the three are a yes or a no with no analysis attached. The honest reading of today is that zero of the available cheap moves were made. Ivo

Revenue base - won / care

Client	Stage	Build	Care	Owner	Next
Струни - ателие (formerly Nina Atelie, music studio)	✅ LIVE ON ITS OWN ADDRESS	600 PAID (05 Aug, direct to Ivo)	24/mo from SEPT	Ivo / Elena	✅ The day-16 breach closed on Thursday and has now HELD through a full day - re-measured tonight at 200 / 155,441 bytes with her own title and her rebranded name in the markup fifteen times, zero foreign-tenant content. The rebrand and all three of the client’s own copy asks shipped on 20 Aug, verified byte-for-byte, share card re-cut, parity 101/101, brand locked against auto-translate. ⚠ Residual, unfixed all day and now its own amber item: the old temporary address still answers 200 at 155,499 bytes instead of redirecting, so a client who paid €600 has two live copies of her site competing in search. The commission chain is ruled and booked (three names, fixed pool, €420 to the house) and still unpaid, which is harder to defer with every day the site is live on her own name. Search-indexing go-live and the September care start are unchanged and human. Photo block unchanged and correct: recognisable children’s faces, no parental consent
Къща за гости Jost (guest house, Sankt Goar, Germany)	💵 BUILD PAID 16 Aug	600 PAID (into a partner’s personal account)	49 ruled / 40 said	Elena	⚠ The number facing the client is still contradictory: 49 published on the partner page, 40 said on the call. Nothing is minted until the rep says which closed. ⚠ The client has asked for a payment link and cannot be given one - day 37, the first time the outage blocks a client actively trying to pay. Go-live is gated on her accountant naming the legal form, which is hers and not ours. ⚠ Hard deadline: the town sells out for a river festival in the second week of September, now under three weeks out - last year they had rooms and no way to offer them. Care not started. Commission ruled, three claimants, two unproven - and the partner page they all read still shows the pre-cut rate, re-measured unchanged tonight for a third pass
Услуги с Bobcat и мини багер (Несебър и региона)	💵 DEPOSIT PAID, work due September	100 deposit, total UNKNOWN	no figure anywhere	Elena	The deposit is double-sourced and this row has taken money - the rep in-channel on 16 Aug corroborated what Ivo had said directly, so the 16 August caveat is discharged. The €100 went straight to Ivo, so it is not part of the rep-held cash pile. 🔴 The commercials behind it exist in no record at all: no total build price, no monthly fee, on a row that has already taken a deposit - and the work is due in September, nine days out. The page still ships placeholder chips and no call link
Психопозитив (Мирела)	✅ BUILD PAID - care never started, day 25 live	300 PAID (18 Aug, personal account, no invoice)	29 NEVER BILLED	Ivo	25 days live, a full September campaign and a ten-asset pack delivered, and the monthly has never once been charged. Delivery is materially ahead of billing on Ivo’s own client - recorded as a leak, not as a bottleneck on anyone else. ✅ The „€0 collected“ framing this board once carried is RETIRED and must not return: the build IS paid. Open gates: her invoice details and the full cabinet address, which block the map, the schema and the contacts block. ⚠ A live defect was found and fixed here - the old contact form composed nothing and was silently discarding every enquiry for an unknown period; she should be told, it changes how she reads her past lead flow
Coffee Shop (brand now „Lady Queen“, Карнобат)	💵 WON - 🔴 instalment 1 disputed, day 3	300 in 3 x 100 ⚠ is #1 paid or not?	24/mo deferred to launch	Elena	🔴 THE RECORD AND THE OWNER DISAGREE ON WHETHER INSTALMENT 1 EXISTS - see blocker #4 above. Now three days untouched. Book it or strike it, and the empty confirmation log is the cheapest route to settling it. ✅ Delivery on 20 Aug was clean: the real address shipped the corrected cherry label (the known misprinted packet, replaced from her own drive drop and re-verified off the live site) and a second orders phone under the first. Local 1,359,721 bytes, the live copy differs only by the known 450-byte email-obfuscation rewrite, parity 209/209. Open at the rep: does the second contact’s card need a job title and email, and lev-versus-euro on the 300
Brilliantin (hotel + restaurant, Сливен)	Care, LIVE on its own address	350 PAID (into the ruled-out entity)	120 = 6mo x 20 PREPAID	Ivo	This row is the one confirmed euro figure inside the #1 blocker: the €350 build was paid into the shared entity Ivo has since ruled out, where other partners would have a claim on it - and that entity is now six days overdue on its filing. ✅ Live on its own real address, apex and www both answering with valid certificates; the temporary address redirects there and that redirect is client-side, so it can only be verified by rendering - never report it broken on a command-line result. Twelve real client photographs shipped. Remaining and small: the search-indexing go-live step, plus a €50 restaurant add-on awaiting the client’s confirmation. ⚠ Carried: the registrant is an entity Ivo does not wholly own
Rakadiko	Care, PREPAID to Aug 2027	200 paid ⚠ destination unresolved	150 cash, 12 months	Elena	✅ NOTHING TO COLLECT FROM THIS CLIENT. The first annual prepay in the book, taken in cash on 07 Aug at a discount, which closed a care month that had been carried overdue for 34 consecutive runs. Use it as the live proof point for the identical annual push still open on his BROTHER, whose care starts in nine days. Do not chase and do not mint a monthly link. Two small residuals: the message never stated the currency, recorded as unconfirmed rather than assumed silently; and the rep’s commission on the 150 is unbooked although she both closed and collected it. The monthly social auto-publish remains open on a platform access gate
Kapitanovi (Kiten)	Care - 🔴 zero August delivery	200 paid	120/yr cash prepaid (~10/mo)	Elena	⚠ The worst of the four zero-delivery care accounts, because here it is a broken written promise rather than a silent gap. Day 22 and unchanged. They prepaid a full year in cash up front, held by the rep, and the June and July packs both closed with „the next pack comes at the beginning of August“ in copy forwarded to the client. It is the 22nd and no August pack exists, with nine days of the month left. This is the one the client can check for herself. Care money is settled, so the only money item is the rail remit of the held cash; the off-season rate stays open
Food Addiction	Care (green)	40/mo build sub ACTIVE	19/mo care sub ACTIVE	Elena	Live on its own real address. Standing open item: the card-versus-cash double-collect confirm is still the rep’s to close. ⚠ August care cycle not yet started - one of the four zero-delivery accounts, day 22. Also carries an unarmed redirect on its temporary address, which creates duplicate content against the paying client’s own domain - the same residual re-confirmed tonight on the music studio, so fix them in one pass
Kameli Club (hotel services)	✅ CARE PAID FOR THE YEAR - settled	400 PAID (one paid, one refunded)	200/yr PAID 03 Aug	Ivo	✅ Nothing is open with this client and she must NOT be approached for further care money this year - the agreed 228 was closed at 200 by ruling and the delta waived deliberately as relationship investment. Do not re-raise the gap; it is a decision, not a shortfall. One item remains and it is Ivo’s: the commission. The ledger excludes the rep as an Ivo-collected account, yet she closed and chased this care - 40% or excluded? Unruled for 18 days, and nothing is booked until he says. ⚠ August care delivery is zero, day 22
Champions Lab	Care starts SEPT - the client set the clock	200 PAID	19/mo from September	Ivo	✅ Do NOT read this row as blocked on Ivo - that framing is retired. The client ruled on 16 Aug that the launch is September, gated on her own new schedule and full location list, so the monthly starts then by her decision. Her disciplines correction was applied and verified by reading the live page back on both addresses, parity 185/185; three professional studio photographs received and verified by opening them; a schedule-free ten-asset social pack was produced. With Ivo: a shortlist of addresses for her to pick, then the care link at the September launch - and September is now nine days away, so the shortlist is the near-term item. Awaiting from her: the new schedule and all locations
Coffee Delmar (Дилмар)	Build closed at 150, care from SEPT	150 closed, how much in hand?	monthly figure never restated	Elena	Live on its own real address. The client set both numbers himself on 16 Aug: build 150 total and he will pay no more for it, monthly starts September. ⚠ Two things only the rep can close, and September is nine days out: how much of the 150 is actually in hand (the book records 100, and a further 50 is counted with her but never recorded as received) and what the monthly number actually is - the book still says 15 and it has never been restated. ✅ His BROTHER just prepaid a year in cash at a discount - use that as the annual push here, and use it this week rather than after the first monthly is missed
TMB Smart (consult)	Delivered / CLOSED	600 / 600 PAID IN FULL	n/a	Ivo	Nothing open on money. Housekeeping only: deactivate the redundant link minted on the ruled-out entity once that account can be reached, and do not send it. Still gated on the client’s list of ten. ⚠ The first instalment’s destination account was never stated, which is one of the two unknowns inside the rail figure
BusinessTax (Niki)	Won - free build, care not triggered	FREE (gift)	19 or 29, his choice	Ivo	Demo live. Mint the care on his choice once there is a clean account to mint it in. The access-handover window EXPIRED on 15 Jul when the incumbent developer relocated - establish from Niki whether the hosting and registrar access was ever taken and, if not, which route replaces it. Site live and unaffected
Terzieva Ivancheva (law firm)	Won - free build, care not triggered	FREE (gift)	19 or 29, her choice	Ivo	Displacement demo live; her domain is renewed to 2027, so the fuse that looked urgent in June is gone. Same revised access-handover ask as the sister company above. Mint on her choice
Boyzone (Bizon Electronics, scooters)	Care (gift) - ⚠ deliverable still unpublished	n/a (gift)	5 PAID on the owner’s own card	Elena	🔴 The last client sitting in the exact condition that churned the tyre-service account: paid, deliverable approved on 20 Jul, still unpublished - now about five weeks. The photographs can publish the standard way today - placeholder where needed, swap on the real ones. Video is the only part still blocked, on a hosting decision that the object storage now live probably already answers. ✅ The cancel-and-refund action is RETIRED - nothing is being collected at all, and the €5 a month accrues as a backlog to be charged when a clean account exists
Кондио (Яна Кондио)	Delivered, NO price and NOT sent	not on record	not on record	Ivo	⚠ A live-site defect, still unfixed: the page declares a typeface that ships no Cyrillic, so every Bulgarian sentence renders in whatever the visitor’s device substitutes - handwritten in one browser, different on every device. Not introduced by us, flagged in-channel, still open. ⚠ And the commercial frame does not exist: she now has a site, a print-ready card and twenty posts delivered with no price attached and nothing sent. Decide the frame, then send. Also carried: reconcile ownership, since the rep called her „my client“ while the commercial state is Ivo-brought

In-flight - deployed / sent

Client	Stage	Owner	Next
Маями (Свети Влас - hotel with restaurant)	✅ REV-2 LIVE - do-not-send LIFTED, unsent day 3	Elena	✅ The six-day defect closed on 20 Aug and holds: re-measured tonight at 200 / 1,350,171 bytes with zero call links, unchanged. It ships with no phone by decision, because the hotel’s own social page publishes that same number - most likely one shared restaurant line rather than a wrong number. Rating, hours and room count are deliberately omitted because they belong to the joint record with the other property. Rooms lead, restaurant is a section, and the commission argument that was absent from the previous page entirely is now the spine of it. One question, hers alone: whose number it is. 🔴 It has now been sendable for three days and has not been sent - this remains the single best-qualified unsent page on the board, and it is core ICP
Милев (Свети Влас - correct brand)	🔴 LIVE, but the RETIRED address still serves the wrong business, day 8	Ivo	The correct page answers 200 at 1,513,920 bytes with the right brand 15 times, re-measured tonight, and the rep was handed that link on 20 Aug with an apology for three days unposted. 🔴 Also re-measured at 19:25 tonight: the retired address beside it still answers 200 at 1,316,093 bytes with the WRONG brand 29 times and the correct brand ZERO times - unchanged through three board passes, day 8. Retire or redirect it. ⚠ And the pitch is INVERTED on this row: they have a live site, so never open with „you have no website“
Kalina i Milan	🔴 SENT 20 Aug - the +2 nudge FELL TODAY and was not served	Elena	Re-sent at 19:36 on 20 Aug after the rep called and spoke to the owner’s wife, at an intended €50 build plus €15 a month. No longer a park candidate - back in the warm table. Sub-€1k, so her price and her send with no Ivo gate. 🔴 The +2 nudge was due today, 22 Aug, and the day has ended with nothing recorded - the capture agent that would have flagged it is off by decision, so this one always needed a person. It slides to tomorrow rather than being lost, but the +5 on the older batch shows what happens when a nudge slides
Paradise (Велинград)	Contacted, NOT yet quoted	Elena	Second call made, staff reached, her number left. ⚠ The intended price is internally contradictory in her own wording - „one-off 100 per month for the build“ - and needs one word from her before it is quoted to anybody. Intended €100 build plus €15 care
Бохеми (Карнобат - one venue, two names)	Sent - no reply, 2nd attempt	Elena	The rep asked and was told „we showed the owners and they said nothing“. Logged as SILENCE, not refusal: no objection, no price said, no owner contact. Second no-answer attempt. Her call: let it lie, or one last direct approach to a named owner
Искрички на радост	✅ PARKED - page still offline as she asked	Elena	✅ She has no registered company, which worries her, and asked on 20 Aug at 19:28 for the demo to go offline and be kept for later. It was honoured inside twenty-four hours and re-checked tonight: still Not Found. Row is Parked and reversible the moment she registers, and the relationship is friendly. ⚠ That non-answer is INTENDED - no future sweep should raise it as a dead object
Лазерен център Hera Stil (Айтос)	🆕 LIVE 18 Aug, unsent, unpriced, day 4	Elena	Briefed off a field note at 01:07 and live at 12:01, verified at 911,017 bytes, live identical to local. WARM - she has the relationship, so the cold cap does not apply. ✅ The rep is a member of this channel, so nothing structural is stopping this one. ⚠ Two facts that must survive into the pitch: their old domain is DEAD, so „you have no website“ is the wrong opening and „your website is gone“ is the right one
Козметичен салон Ирис / PARADISE (Карнобат)	🔴 LIVE 18 Aug - THE REP IS LOCKED OUT, day 4	Elena	Live and verified at 1,034,589 bytes; the „two links are one page“ trap was caught before building, so one demo was made rather than two. 🔴 The person who would price and send it still cannot see it - the channel has one member, the workspace app - on day 4. ⚠ The name call is genuinely open and hers: this is one business under four names
Милица Петрова-Тодорова (child psychologist)	⚠ LIVE, ratify or pull - day 3 unruled	Ivo	⚠ It shipped while the decision it was escalated for was still open, on the default-allow, and the decision is still open three days later. In its favour, and it is not small: the page states four facts and nothing else, ships zero photographs by decision (a stock child on a child-psychologist page is an implied claim about her clients), the call and message buttons are visibly inert with a „coming“ chip rather than a fake number, the form prints „nothing was sent“ instead of a false confirmation, and the regulated-claim sweep is clean on the live bytes. Ratify it or pull it - but it is live either way
🏭 The Pattaya batch, 19 Aug - 19 live and unsent, 3 stopped before code, all unpriced, nobody contacted, day 3
Pattaya Night Bazaar (management company, not an owner)	🔴 LIVE - DO NOT SEND, UNPATCHED day 3	Ivo	🔴 The only person who can send is NOT in this channel. The live page animates the rating 4.2 and the review count 23,669 and carries no translate guard. Static markup first, then a guard on every wordmark. ⚠ The requester’s premise was wrong - they asked for three more languages and the page already ships seven - so re-brief before rebuilding
The Sanctuary of Truth Museum (has its own site - never pitch „no website“)	🔴 LIVE - DO NOT SEND, UNPATCHED day 3	Ivo	Animates rating and reviews the same way and carries no translate guard. All three pitch wedges are gone, so the argument has to be measured defects, not absence. Inside the unruled attraction group
Love In Museum (erotic art museum)	✅ RULED + LIVE - ordinary unsent row	Ivo	✅ Cleared out of the unruled group on three binding conditions: no badge, owner photographs only, no age claim. It is now an ordinary live-and-unsent row rather than an escalation
Pattaya Elephant Village (stopped before code)	🛑 NOT BUILT - escalated, gate unruled	Ivo	🔴 The only person who can send is NOT in this channel. Back-riding on the profile. Standing recommendation: DROP. The empty address is correct - there is no object, so its non-answer is the right answer
Tiger Park & Snake Show (both stopped before code)	🛑 NOT BUILT - escalated, gate unruled	Ivo	Both stopped at the animal-welfare gate before a line of code, both escalated, both still unruled on day 3. Stopping there is the cheapest possible place to stop, and their empty addresses are correct rather than broken. ⚠ The rep is not in either channel
The other 15 Pattaya pages (cafes, parks, aquarium, museums, paramotor)	LIVE, unsent, unpriced, nobody contacted	Ivo	All fifteen verified serving on the last full sweep. This is the whole of bucket (3) - genuinely unasked: fifteen live pages, fifteen real businesses, not one person contacted, on day 3. ⚠ Several carry inversions that must survive into any pitch: three have their own sites, one is a successor to a permanently closed cafe at the same address (so 5.0 from 20 reviews means NEW, not weak - do not price down on review count), and one relocated and says so on its own profile, so it must never be pitched as a new opening. 🔴 Nine of the batch sit in channels the only sender cannot see

Cold inventory + how reps will own it

About 32 speculative demos built and live with no named recipient, plus about 75 tracked deployed-but-unsent in client channels = about 107 built and in front of nobody, against a cap of 5. MOVEMENT SINCE THE LAST SPINE: NONE IN, NONE OUT - and with today added, the factory has now been quiet for three days running while the pile has not fallen. ✅ One page is deliberately off air - the client-requested take-down, confirmed still Not Found tonight - so the count of pages actually serving is one lower than the headline. ⚠ THE 16 AUGUST RULING STILL GOVERNS WHAT THIS COUNT MEANS: it is THREE piles, not one, and only one of them is a send queue. (1) FREE BY DECISION - the build was given away deliberately and no ask exists: the Finnish log-homes client, traded against introductions to our other product; the Pattaya gym, told it is free with the footer as the upsell; the German office client, whose site is the partner’s own; the nail studio, ruled a free barter demo by the person who owns sub-€1k pricing. (2) NO COUNTERPARTY - there is nobody at the other end to ask: the Bangkok bakery bar, who never answered „owner or manager“; the whole Bangkok restaurant batch, never reached at all. (3) GENUINELY UNASKED - the real queue, and the entire Pattaya batch sits here: nineteen live pages, nineteen real businesses, not one person contacted, now on day 3. ⚠ Two of the nineteen are DO-NOT-SEND until patched, and nine sit in channels the only sender cannot see, so „unsent“ understates the position rather than overstating it. Read the composition rather than the number. Three days of zero builds and a pile that fell by one is the counter-proof from both directions: building was never the constraint and neither is stopping. The constraint is a person handing a page over, which happened once in the last four days and four times in the last thirteen. ⚠ And the best-qualified page on the whole board is still not in this pile at all - the Свети Влас hotel has now been sendable and unsent for three days. Inventory to split, assign or archive, not a queue to blast. Ivo / Elena

Removed / parked / churned

✅ NO NEW DEPARTURES TODAY, AND THE ONE THAT COMPLETED ON THURSDAY HOLDS: the children’s party client asked for her live page to be taken offline and kept for a later stage, because she has no registered company yet - the ask was honoured inside twenty-four hours and the page was re-checked tonight and is still off air. The row is Parked and reversible the moment she registers, and the relationship is friendly. ⚠ Carry one instruction with it: that address returns Not Found BY DESIGN, so no future sweep should raise it as a dead object. Nothing else was declined, parked or churned, and nothing has left the revenue base for a fifteenth consecutive window - the base holds at 17 rows. Three arrivals remain correctly REFUSED rather than admitted: the snake show, the tiger park and the elephant village were stopped before a line of code on brand-safety grounds and escalated on 19 Aug, still unruled on day 3, which is the cheapest possible place to stop and is why their addresses correctly return nothing - there is no object, not a broken one. One row remains off the board by replacement rather than removal: the Свети Влас page built under the wrong brand is retired, its address must not be sent, and the correct page lives at a new one - but the retired address is still serving the wrong business, re-measured tonight and byte-for-byte unchanged on day 8, which is why it is a live risk above rather than a closed item. Standing terminal rows are unchanged: the mobile tyre service churned on 03 Aug and still has no clean close, the detailing client was retired by decision, and the barbershop, the park restaurant, the Karlovo hotel and the car service all declined earlier in the summer with their sources retained and reversible.

Stages: Lead → Qualified → Demo built → Deployed → Sent → Replied → Won → Care. Terminal: Declined / Parked / Churned. Owners: Ivo price/money/scope/domains; Elena sub-€1k price, send, client comms; Ivo/Elena shared; rep ambassador. Sources: the journey-state spine (21 Aug 06:40 reconcile, live column verified across 158 addresses in a clean scratch directory with caching and compression defeated: 149 answered, zero genuine dead objects, third consecutive run) + confirmed facts (16 Aug) + the money book and its structured per-payment layer (25 rows, grain = one payment) + the agents’ own run-state + the client-channel roster re-enumerated to the end of results (123 active, FLAT). Evening pass: the 22 Aug reconcile fired 13 hours before this board and has still written no spine, so eight addresses were re-measured directly on the wire at 19:25 tonight rather than carried - two closures held, three blockers were byte-for-byte unchanged for a third consecutive pass, and every day-counter above is derived from that measurement. Open-item count excludes „✅ holds“ entries: 19 rows rendered, 25 tracked items, 7 blockers, none moved all day. Internal use only - do not share outside the venture.